Stoic News

By Dave Kelly

Saturday, August 09, 2025

Supporting Sterling's 5-Step System with Encheiridion 1-5

 Claude identifies G. Sterling a little too closely to some things which are actually  logical extensions to Sterling's thinking.


Supporting Sterling's 5-Step System with Encheiridion 1-5


## **STEP 1: Foundation (Only virtue good, don't desire externals)**


### **Encheiridion 1 - Direct Foundation:**

> "Some things are under our control, while others are not under our control... not under our control are our body, our property, reputation, office, and, in a word, everything that is not our own doing."


**Sterling's Step 1 Connection:**

- **"Don't desire externals"** = Encheiridion's "body, property, reputation, office" are explicitly NOT under our control

- **"Only virtue good"** = Only "what is our own doing" (our choices, conception, desire, aversion) can be good

- **The foundation** = Encheiridion 1's core message that externals cannot be genuinely good or bad


### **Encheiridion 2 - Desire Elimination:**

> "If, then, you avoid only what is unnatural among those things which are under your control, you will fall into none of the things which you avoid; but if you try to avoid disease, or death, or poverty, you will experience misfortune."


**Perfect Match:** Sterling's "don't desire externals" is exactly Encheiridion 2's instruction to remove desire from uncontrollables.


---


## **STEP 2: Control Test ("Is this in my control or not?")**


### **Encheiridion 1 - The Exact Question:**

> "Make it, therefore, your study at the very outset to say to every harsh external impression... Whether the impression has to do with the things which are under our control, or with those which are not under our control; and, if it has to do with some one of the things not under our control, have ready to hand the answer, 'It is nothing to me.'"


**Perfect Correspondence:** 

- **Sterling**: "Is this in my control or not?"

- **Epictetus**: "Whether the impression has to do with the things which are under our control, or with those which are not under our control"


**This is literally the same protocol.**


---


## **STEP 3: Precision Control (beliefs, judgments, choices)**


### **Encheiridion 1 - Exact Specification:**

> "Under our control are conception, choice, desire, aversion, and, in a word, everything that is our own doing"


**Sterling's Three Categories:**

- **Beliefs** = Epictetus's "conception" 

- **Judgments** = Epictetus's "conception" (mental assessments)

- **Choices** = Epictetus's "choice, desire, aversion"


### **Encheiridion 2 - Refined Application:**

> "But employ only choice and refusal, and these too but lightly, and with reservations, and without straining."


**Sterling's precision** about focusing specifically on controllables matches Epictetus's instruction to "employ only choice and refusal."


---


## **STEP 4: Emotion Connection (emotions from judgments, not events)**


### **Encheiridion 5 - Direct Statement:**

> "It is not the things themselves that disturb men, but their judgements about these things. For example, death is nothing dreadful, or else Socrates too would have thought so, but the judgement that death is dreadful, this is the dreadful thing."


**Perfect Match:**

- **Sterling**: "Your emotions come from your value judgments, not from events"

- **Epictetus**: "It is not the things themselves that disturb men, but their judgements about these things"


**Identical insight:** External events don't cause emotions - our judgments about those events do.


### **Encheiridion 5 - Personal Responsibility:**

> "When, therefore, we are hindered, or disturbed, or grieved, let us never blame anyone but ourselves, that means, our own judgements."


**Sterling's implication:** If emotions come from judgments, and judgments are controlled, then we're responsible for our emotional states.


---


## **STEP 5: Real-Time Correction (CATCH-RECOGNIZE-REPLACE)**


### **Encheiridion 1 - The Protocol:**

> "Make it, therefore, your study at the very outset to say to every harsh external impression, 'You are an external impression and not at all what you appear to be.' After that examine it and test it by these rules which you have"


**Sterling's 3-Step Process:**

1. **CATCH**: "say to every harsh external impression" = Notice the false judgment

2. **RECOGNIZE**: "You are an external impression and not at all what you appear to be" = Identify it as false

3. **REPLACE**: "examine it and test it by these rules" = Apply correct framework


### **Encheiridion 3 - Practical Application:**

> "With everything which entertains you, is useful, or of which you are fond, remember to say to yourself... 'What is its nature?' If you are fond of a jug, say, 'I am fond of a jug'; for when it is broken you will not be disturbed."


**Real-Time Correction Example:**

- **CATCH**: "I'm fond of this jug" (attachment to external)

- **RECOGNIZE**: "This is fondness for an external object"

- **REPLACE**: "A jug is breakable and indifferent; my attachment is the problem"


### **Encheiridion 4 - Anticipatory Correction:**

> "When you are on the point of putting your hand to some undertaking, remind yourself what the nature of that undertaking is... And thus you will set about your undertaking more securely if at the outset you say to yourself..."


**Preventive Application of 5-Step System:** Use the framework BEFORE problems arise.


---


## **THE PERFECT CORRESPONDENCE:**


### **Sterling's 5 Steps = Encheiridion 1-5 Systematized:**


**Encheiridion 1** → **Steps 2 & 3**: Control classification and precision

**Encheiridion 2** → **Step 1**: Don't desire externals 

**Encheiridion 3** → **Step 5**: Real-time correction protocol

**Encheiridion 4** → **Step 5**: Anticipatory application

**Encheiridion 5** → **Step 4**: Emotions from judgments


### **Sterling's Achievement:**

He extracted the **operational essence** of Encheiridion 1-5 and organized it into a **step-by-step system** that can be immediately applied.


### **The Vindication:**

Sterling's claim that **"the heart and soul of Stoic ethics"** is contained in Encheiridion 1-5 is proven by this perfect correspondence. His 5-step system isn't an interpretation of Stoicism - **it's Epictetus systematized for practical use.**


### **Encheiridion as Sterling's Foundation:**

Every element of Sterling's functional system has direct textual support in Epictetus's opening sections. This demonstrates that Sterling's approach isn't modern innovation but **authentic extraction** of the core Stoic framework.


**The 5-step system IS Encheiridion 1-5 in operational form.**


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home