Sterling's 5-Step System as Correct Impression Use: Three Demonstrations
# Sterling's 5-Step System as Correct Impression Use: Three Demonstrations
## **The Framework:**
**Step 1 (Foundation)**: Impressions with external value content are always false
**Step 2 (Control Test)**: Before assenting, check if impression concerns controllables
**Step 3 (Precision)**: Focus impressions on beliefs, judgments, choices only
**Step 4 (Emotion Connection)**: Emotional impressions trace to value judgments
**Step 5 (Real-Time Correction)**: CATCH false value impressions, RECOGNIZE their falseness, REPLACE with virtue focus
---
## **DEMONSTRATION 1: Job Loss Crisis**
### **The Impression Stream:**
*"I just got fired. This is terrible. My career is ruined. I'm a failure. How will I pay bills? What will people think?"*
### **Step 1 (Foundation): Impressions with external value content are always false**
**Identify false value assignments:**
- *"This is terrible"* = External value judgment (job loss = bad)
- *"I'm a failure"* = External value judgment (employment status = personal worth)
- *"Career is ruined"* = External value judgment (career outcomes = life quality)
**Recognition**: All these impressions contain false external value content.
### **Step 2 (Control Test): Before assenting, check if impression concerns controllables**
**Apply control analysis:**
- Being fired → External/uncontrollable
- Career trajectory → External/uncontrollable
- Others' opinions → External/uncontrollable
- Bill payment outcomes → External/uncontrollable
- **My response to this situation** → Internal/controllable
**Refuse assent** to impressions about uncontrollables.
### **Step 3 (Precision): Focus impressions on beliefs, judgments, choices only**
**Redirect attention to actual controllables:**
- *"What do I believe about this situation?"*
- *"How am I judging what happened?"*
- *"What choices do I have for response?"*
**Precise focus**: My beliefs about unemployment, my judgments about what this means, my choices for next steps.
### **Step 4 (Emotion Connection): Emotional impressions trace to value judgments**
**Trace emotions to their judgmental source:**
- Devastation comes from judging job loss as genuinely harmful
- Shame comes from judging employment status as determining worth
- Anxiety comes from judging financial uncertainty as threatening wellbeing
**Recognition**: Emotions aren't from being fired—they're from false value judgments about being fired.
### **Step 5 (Real-Time Correction): CATCH-RECOGNIZE-REPLACE**
**CATCH**: *"I'm treating this job loss as if it affects my actual wellbeing"*
**RECOGNIZE**: *"Job loss is external and therefore indifferent"*
**REPLACE**: *"This is an opportunity to practice courage, wisdom, and dignity. How can I respond with excellence?"*
**Result**: Calm, virtuous response to external circumstance.
---
## **DEMONSTRATION 2: Relationship Conflict**
### **The Impression Stream:**
*"She's being so unfair to me. She doesn't appreciate what I do. This relationship is falling apart. I need her to understand my side. If she leaves me, I'll be devastated."*
### **Step 1 (Foundation): Impressions with external value content are always false**
**Identify false value assignments:**
- *"She's being unfair"* = External value judgment (her behavior = bad for me)
- *"She doesn't appreciate me"* = External value judgment (her appreciation = good for me)
- *"This relationship falling apart"* = External value judgment (relationship status = my wellbeing)
**Recognition**: All contain false external value content.
### **Step 2 (Control Test): Before assenting, check if impression concerns controllables**
**Apply control analysis:**
- Her behavior → External/uncontrollable
- Her feelings toward me → External/uncontrollable
- Relationship outcome → External/uncontrollable
- Whether she leaves → External/uncontrollable
- **How I treat her** → Internal/controllable
- **My character in this conflict** → Internal/controllable
**Refuse assent** to impressions about her controllables.
### **Step 3 (Precision): Focus impressions on beliefs, judgments, choices only**
**Redirect to controllables:**
- *"What do I believe about how partners should treat each other?"*
- *"How am I judging this conflict situation?"*
- *"What choices do I have for responding with virtue?"*
**Precise focus**: My beliefs about relationships, my judgments about conflict, my choices for virtuous response.
### **Step 4 (Emotion Connection): Emotional impressions trace to value judgments**
**Trace emotions to judgmental source:**
- Anger comes from judging her behavior as bad for me
- Hurt comes from judging her lack of appreciation as harmful
- Fear comes from judging relationship loss as threatening my wellbeing
**Recognition**: Emotions stem from treating relationship externals as affecting my genuine good.
### **Step 5 (Real-Time Correction): CATCH-RECOGNIZE-REPLACE**
**CATCH**: *"I'm making my wellbeing dependent on her responses to me"*
**RECOGNIZE**: *"Her behavior and feelings are external and indifferent"*
**REPLACE**: *"How can I treat her with justice, kindness, and honesty regardless of her response? What would virtue look like here?"*
**Result**: Loving response without attachment to reciprocation.
---
## **DEMONSTRATION 3: Health Diagnosis**
### **The Impression Stream:**
*"The doctor says I might have cancer. This could kill me. I'm too young for this. My family needs me. What if the treatment doesn't work? My life is falling apart."*
### **Step 1 (Foundation): Impressions with external value content are always false**
**Identify false value assignments:**
- *"This could kill me"* = External value judgment (death = evil)
- *"I'm too young"* = External value judgment (timing = matters for wellbeing)
- *"My family needs me"* = External value judgment (my physical presence = their good)
- *"My life is falling apart"* = External value judgment (health outcomes = life quality)
**Recognition**: All treat health/death as affecting genuine wellbeing.
### **Step 2 (Control Test): Before assenting, check if impression concerns controllables**
**Apply control analysis:**
- Having cancer → External/uncontrollable
- Treatment outcomes → External/uncontrollable
- Length of life → External/uncontrollable
- Family's future wellbeing → External/uncontrollable
- **My response to diagnosis** → Internal/controllable
- **How I handle treatment** → Internal/controllable
**Refuse assent** to impressions about medical uncontrollables.
### **Step 3 (Precision): Focus impressions on beliefs, judgments, choices only**
**Redirect to controllables:**
- *"What do I believe about sickness and health?"*
- *"How am I judging what this diagnosis means?"*
- *"What choices do I have for responding wisely?"*
**Precise focus**: My beliefs about mortality, my judgments about illness, my choices for character response.
### **Step 4 (Emotion Connection): Emotional impressions trace to value judgments**
**Trace emotions to judgmental source:**
- Terror comes from judging death as genuinely evil
- Despair comes from judging illness as ruining life quality
- Anxiety comes from judging treatment uncertainty as threatening wellbeing
**Recognition**: Fear isn't from having cancer—it's from false judgments about what cancer means for genuine wellbeing.
### **Step 5 (Real-Time Correction): CATCH-RECOGNIZE-REPLACE**
**CATCH**: *"I'm treating this health situation as if it can affect my actual good"*
**RECOGNIZE**: *"Health and sickness are external and therefore indifferent"*
**REPLACE**: *"This is an opportunity to practice courage and wisdom. How can I face this with dignity? What virtue can I express through this experience?"*
**Result**: Peaceful acceptance with appropriate medical action, demonstrating courage regardless of outcomes.
---
## **The Pattern Across All Three Demonstrations**
### **What Makes This "Correct Use of Impressions":**
1. **Systematic Value Analysis**: Each step identifies and corrects false external value assignments
2. **Precise Control Focus**: Attention redirects from externals to actual controllables
3. **Emotional Tracing**: Feelings are traced to their judgmental sources rather than external triggers
4. **Virtue Orientation**: Every situation becomes opportunity for character excellence
5. **Real-Time Application**: The process works moment-to-moment as impressions arise
### **The Integration Achievement:**
**Epictetus' insight**: Handle impressions correctly through proper assent/dissent
**Sterling's system**: Provides the exact framework for what "correct" means and how to apply it systematically
**Result**: Every impression becomes a precise opportunity to practice virtue through accurate value assessment and controlled response—making Sterling's 5-step system the operational method for Epictetus' foundational practice.
---
## **Quick Reference Guide**
### **For Any Disturbing Impression:**
1. **Step 1**: Does this contain external value content? (Usually yes)
2. **Step 2**: Is this about something I control? (Usually no)
3. **Step 3**: What beliefs, judgments, choices do I actually control here?
4. **Step 4**: What false value judgment is creating my emotional reaction?
5. **Step 5**: CATCH the false judgment, RECOGNIZE it's false, REPLACE with virtue focus
### **The Test of Success:**
You're using impressions correctly when external events become neutral contexts for virtue practice rather than sources of emotional disturbance.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home