The Corpus Substitution — Hill’s Drift Doctrine Replaced by Its Corpus Counterparts v1.0
The Corpus Substitution — Hill’s Drift Doctrine Replaced by Its Corpus Counterparts v1.0
Theoretical foundations: Grant C. Sterling (Eastern Illinois University). Analysis and synthesis: Dave Kelly. Prose rendering: Claude (Anthropic). 2026.
The Beginning
Nothing below is a correction of Hill by preference. Each substitution is derived, and the derivation starts where the corpus starts.
The universe is rationally ordered and governed by divine reason (Prop 1), and all outcomes in the external world are determined by Providence (Prop 2). A person’s true identity is constituted by the rational faculty alone (Props 3–4); everything other than that faculty, the body included, is external to the self (Prop 5). Impressions arrive from the external world and their arrival is not in our control (Props 6, 8). The faculty has the power to assent or to withhold assent (Prop 10), and that act is the only thing in our control (Prop 11). From this the value ontology follows: only virtue is genuinely good and only vice genuinely evil (Prop 17); all externals are neither (Prop 18); the belief that any external is good or evil is factually false (Prop 20).
Every replacement stated below is read off that chain. Where Hill’s proposition survives, it survives because the chain permits it, not because it is serviceable.
Disposition of the Eight
H1 — Struck. The corpus draws no line between drifting lives and purposeful ones. The division falls at each act of assent, not across a life-shape: the agent assents to a true impression or to a false one (Props 10–14), virtue consists of rational acts of will and vice of irrational ones (Prop 34), and appropriateness is settled at the moment of choice (Prop 38). A life is not a category a person falls into. It is a sequence of such moments.
H2 — Struck. No external agency induces the condition. Fear is produced by the agent’s own assent to an impression that some external is evil (Props 13–14, 23–26); the emotions so caused include fear, grief, anger, and disappointment (Prop 27). If assent is withheld, nothing follows — no emotion, no desire, no action (Prop 12). The cause is internal and is the agent’s own.
H3 — Struck. An irreversible fixation by natural law contradicts the standing power of the faculty. Judgment is in our control (Prop 52); by controlling assent we can eliminate all false value beliefs (Prop 53) and with them the pathological emotions and the desires for externals (Prop 54). No single correct choice constitutes virtue and no single incorrect choice destroys it; the work is continuous and the next choice is always within purview (Prop 80).
H4 — Retained with correction. Not the mind entire. Impressions present themselves and their arrival is outside our control (Prop 8). What is in our control is the act of assent (Prop 11), and with it the things directly related to virtue — beliefs, desires, will (Prop 16). The correction matters: a doctrine that claims the whole mind claims something the agent does not have, and the failure to hold it is then read as a personal defect.
H5 — Struck. There are not six instruments. Poverty, criticism, health, love, age, and death are all externals (Prop 19), preferred or dispreferred but neither good nor evil (Prop 21). Every fear of them is one error applied to six objects: the false belief that an external has genuine value (Props 20, 24–26). The enumeration multiplies what is single.
H6 — Struck. A definite major purpose is an object of desire held as a genuine good, and an act aiming at such an object is not virtuous (Prop 36). Preferred indifferents are appropriate objects to aim at though not genuinely good (Prop 22); virtue consists in pursuing appropriate objects of aim rather than the objects of our desires (Prop 37). The aim is held with reservation — the acknowledgment that outcomes are in the hands of Providence (Prop 35c).
H7 — Struck as inverted. Providence does not cooperate with the agent’s purpose. The order runs the other way: outcomes are determined by Providence (Props 1–2), and the agent’s aim is held subject to that, not underwritten by it (Prop 35c). Hill’s formulation makes the divine an instrument of the agent’s external ends.
H8 — Struck. Outcomes are not evidence of the condition of the faculty. Wealth, achievement, and independence are externals (Prop 19), preferred at most (Prop 21). The appropriateness of a choice is determined entirely at the moment of choice, regardless of outcomes (Prop 38): an appropriate choice that produces a dispreferred result remains appropriate, and an inappropriate choice that produces a preferred result remains inappropriate (Prop 63). Success measures nothing about the will.
Residue
One of the eight survives, and it survives corrected. What remains after the substitution is not an amended Hill but the corpus’s own account, and that account has no use for a drift category.
The reason is structural. Drift names a third condition — neither correct nor in error, but adrift — into which a person is supposed to slide by inattention and from which he must be extracted by purpose. The corpus admits two modes and no third: the standing disposition, in which settled dogmata forestall false impressions without deliberate effort, and the recovery audit, in which a pathos already assented to is corrected retrospectively. There is no interval of drift between them, because there is no moment at which the faculty is not either holding correctly or holding falsely. What Hill describes as drifting is, in every instance, an assent already given.
Theoretical foundations: Grant C. Sterling (Eastern Illinois University). Analysis and synthesis: Dave Kelly. Prose rendering: Claude (Anthropic). 2026.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home