Tonal Map — The Classical Stoic System

 

Tonal Map — The Classical Stoic System

Functional clusters with a tonal character on each node. The cross-links below the tree show who leans on whom. Tonal descriptors are evocative, not definitional.

THE-CLASSICAL-STOIC-SYSTEM
  <the-reconstructed-citadel : austere-outside / warm-at-the-core>
│
├─ 1. THE-FOUNDATIONS
│     <bedrock : non-negotiable : load-bearing-and-quiet>
│   ├─ Six-Commitments-C1-C6
│   │   ├─ the-displaced-six
│   │   └─ minority-now-not-refuted
│   ├─ Three-Foundational-Claims
│   │   ├─ only-inner-in-control
│   │   ├─ virtue-the-only-good
│   │   └─ right-assent-yields-eudaimonia
│   ├─ Core-Stoicism-Theorems
│   │   └─ the-derivational-engine
│   └─ Nine-Excerpts
│       └─ the-primary-quarry
│
├─ 2. THE-PROPOSITIONAL-SPINE
│     <the-axiom-vault : dense : discovered-not-planned>
│   ├─ SLE-v4.0
│   │   └─ eighty-unified-propositions
│   ├─ Props-1-58
│   │   └─ synthesized-from-Nine-Excerpts
│   └─ Props-59-80
│       └─ the-action-proposition-set
│
├─ 3. THE-AUDIT-FAMILY
│     <forensic : verdict-bearing : the-prosecutors>
│   ├─ CPA
│   │   └─ names-the-figure
│   ├─ CIA
│   │   └─ tries-the-ideology
│   └─ CDA-v1.1
│       └─ reads-the-culture-beneath-speech
│
├─ 4. THE-CORPUS-EVALUATOR
│     <general-purpose : tiered : measures-anything-against-everything>
│   ├─ SCE-v1.0
│   │   └─ any-idea-against-full-corpus
│   └─ tiered-protocol
│       └─ scales-to-the-question
│
├─ 5. THE-ACTION-AXIS
│     <restrained : disciplined : runs-on-one-theorem>
│   ├─ SDF-v3.3
│   │   └─ decides-the-act
│   ├─ CAA-v1.0
│   │   └─ audits-the-act / refuses-the-verdict
│   ├─ Scenario-Generator-v2.1
│   │   └─ builds-the-scenarios-SDF-runs-on
│   └─ shared-spine
│       └─ Theorem-29
│
├─ 6. THE-PRACTICE-INSTRUMENTS
│     <interior : perceptual : the-correction-of-seeing>
│   ├─ Five-Step-Method
│   │   └─ reception-to-decision
│   ├─ The-One-Method
│   │   └─ de-filtering-by-temperament
│   └─ Integrated-Practical-Model
│       └─ corrective-plus-constructive
│
├─ 7. THE-SCHOLAR-INSTRUMENTS
│     <humble : gap-declaring : honest-about-its-limits>
│   ├─ SEI-v1.0
│   │   └─ ancient-record-meets-scholar
│   └─ SFI-v1.0
│       └─ maps-the-living-field
│
├─ 8. THE-GENERATIVE-LAYER
│     <playful-within-constraint : the-system-at-ease>
│   ├─ GNP-v1.0
│   │   └─ presupposition-driven-fiction
│   └─ The-Appointment
│       └─ first-story
│
└─ 9. THE-GOVERNANCE-LAYER
      <the-registrar : version-controlled : keeps-everyone-honest>
    ├─ System-Map
    │   └─ master-corpus-registry
    └─ Grounding-Map-v1.0
        └─ horizontal-relationships


FUNCTIONAL-CROSS-LINKS — WHO-LEANS-ON-WHOM
│
├─ Six-Commitments-C1-C6
│   ├─ CPA-CIA ............. as-evaluative-standard
│   ├─ SFI ................. as-subject-mapped-around
│   ├─ CDA ................. as-inverted-basis
│   └─ The-One-Method ...... as-integrated-practice
│
├─ Theorem-29
│   ├─ SDF-Step-3 .......... governing-proposition
│   └─ CAA ................. governing-proposition
│
├─ Proposition-4
│   ├─ CIA-orexis-distinction
│   └─ One-Method-reclassification
│
├─ Nine-Excerpts-Section-7
│   ├─ SDF ................. two-assent-structure
│   └─ Integrated-Practical-Model
│
├─ The-Full-Corpus
│   └─ SCE ................. evaluates-against-all-of-it
│
├─ The-80-Propositions
│   ├─ SLE ................. is-the-set
│   ├─ SDF ................. operative-rule-set
│   └─ SCE ................. run-citations
│
└─ Scenario-Generator
    └─ feeds-SDF-runs

Three grounding relationships to C1–C6 are not interchangeable: evaluative-standard (measures against), subject (maps around), and inverted-basis (tests the negation). A finding labelled by C-number means different things across them. Two structural facts the map makes visible at a glance: the entire action axis rests on a single theorem, and the Six Commitments carry almost the whole audit layer alone.