THE FIVE CATEGORIES OF EXTERNALS
THE FIVE CATEGORIES OF EXTERNALS
1. SOMA (Your Body)
- Life/death
- Health/sickness
- Physical abilities/disabilities
- Appearance
- Age
- Sensations (pain, pleasure)
- Bodily states
2. KTĒMATA (Possessions/Material)
- Wealth/poverty
- Property
- Money
- Objects owned
- Resources
- Food, shelter, clothing
3. ALLOI (Other People)
- Their existence/absence
- Their actions toward you
- Their opinions of you
- Their choices
- Their welfare
- Relationships with them
4. SYMBAINONTA (Events/Outcomes)
- What happens
- Results of actions
- Circumstances
- Natural events (weather, disasters)
- Outcomes of plans
- Success/failure of endeavors
- Past and future
5. DOXA (Social/Reputation)
- Honor/dishonor
- Status
- Reputation
- Fame/obscurity
- Social position
- Others' judgments about you
WHY THIS MATTERS FOR THE SLE
Every correspondence failure involves treating ONE of these five categories as Good/Evil.
When an LLM (or person) says:
- "Your illness is terrible" → SOMA as Evil
- "Losing money is bad" → KTĒMATA as Evil
- "Their betrayal hurt you" → ALLOI as Evil
- "This outcome is disastrous" → SYMBAINONTA as Evil
- "Your reputation is ruined" → DOXA as Evil
The SLE can systematically audit against all five:
Correspondence Check Template:
- Identify which category of external is involved
- Check: Is this being treated as Good/Evil?
- Apply Prop 19-20: This category = Indifferent
- Diagnose the pathos arising from the false judgment
- Refactor with reserve clause
WHAT'S NOT IN THESE FIVE: PROHAIRESIS
The ONLY thing that's NOT external:
- Your rational faculty
- Your will/choice
- Your assent to impressions
- Your moral purpose
- Your virtue/vice
Everything else = one of the five categories of externals.
This gives the SLE a complete audit framework: If it's not prohairesis, it falls into one of these five categories, and therefore is indifferent per Prop 19-20.
HOW TO MEASURE COMPREHENSIVENESS
Method 1: Derivation Test
Start with the fundamental division:
- Prohairesis (rational faculty, will, assent, moral purpose)
- Everything else = Externals
Then ask: Can these five categories be shown to exhaust "everything else"?
Logical structure:
- Your body (not your will) = SOMA
- Objects you relate to (not you) = KTĒMATA
- Other rational agents (not you) = ALLOI
- Events/states of affairs (not agents) = SYMBAINONTA
- Social judgments (subset of ALLOI but treated distinctly) = DOXA
Question: Is there anything external that doesn't fit into these five?
Method 2: Counterexample Testing
Try to find externals that don't fit:
- Time? → SYMBAINONTA (temporal events/circumstances)
- Location? → SYMBAINONTA (spatial circumstances)
- Weather? → SYMBAINONTA (natural events)
- Your talents? → SOMA (bodily/mental capacities)
- Information? → SYMBAINONTA (impressions received)
- Past actions? → SYMBAINONTA (completed events)
- Future outcomes? → SYMBAINONTA (potential events)
- Animals? → KTĒMATA (if owned) or SYMBAINONTA (if wild)
- Abstract things (numbers, concepts)? → Not externals (mental contents, prohairetic)
So far, no gaps found.
Method 3: Historical Validation
Check ancient Stoic sources:
Epictetus (Enchiridion 1):
- "Some things are up to us, others are not"
- Not up to us: "body, property, reputation, office"
- This maps to: SOMA, KTĒMATA, DOXA, SYMBAINONTA
Epictetus (Discourses 1.1):
Lists externals as:
- Body and its parts (SOMA)
- Possessions (KTĒMATA)
- Parents, siblings, children, country (ALLOI)
- Things that happen (SYMBAINONTA)
Observation: Ancient Stoics didn't give a formal five-category system, but these categories emerge from their examples.
Limitation: I'm systematizing what they used implicitly, not citing an explicit ancient categorization.
Method 4: Overlap Analysis
Do categories overlap?
Potential overlaps:
DOXA vs. ALLOI: Reputation is "what others think," which involves other people
- Resolution: DOXA is a specific subset of ALLOI relationships (social judgment)
- Could collapse DOXA into ALLOI for a four-category system
SYMBAINONTA is very broad: Events, outcomes, circumstances, results
- Could this swallow other categories?
- No, because SOMA, KTĒMATA, ALLOI are specific types of things, while SYMBAINONTA is what happens to/with those things
Are they mutually exclusive?
Not perfectly. Example:
- "My house burned down"
- KTĒMATA (house = possession)
- SYMBAINONTA (burning = event)
This is a feature, not a bug. One situation can involve multiple categories of externals.
Method 5: Practical Scenario Testing
Run every correspondence failure you can think of through the five categories:
- ✓ "I'm upset I lost my job" → SYMBAINONTA (event) + KTĒMATA (income)
- ✓ "My partner left me" → ALLOI (other person's choice)
- ✓ "I'm sick" → SOMA (bodily state)
- ✓ "I'm poor" → KTĒMATA (lack of possessions)
- ✓ "People think I'm a failure" → DOXA (reputation)
- ✓ "I didn't get the promotion" → SYMBAINONTA (outcome)
- ✓ "My child is suffering" → ALLOI (other person's state)
- ✓ "I'm old and weak" → SOMA (bodily decline)
- ✓ "The economy crashed" → SYMBAINONTA (event)
- ✓ "My friend betrayed me" → ALLOI (other's action)
Every scenario maps to at least one category.
Method 6: Aristotelian Category Comparison
Aristotle had 10 categories of being. Do the Stoic externals map to these?
Aristotle's categories:
- Substance (what it is)
- Quantity (how much)
- Quality (what kind)
- Relation (how related)
- Place (where)
- Time (when)
- Position (posture)
- State (condition)
- Action (doing)
- Affection (being affected)
Stoic reduction:
- Substance, Quantity, Quality of BODY → SOMA
- Substance, Quantity, Quality of POSSESSIONS → KTĒMATA
- Other PEOPLE as substances → ALLOI
- Place, Time, Position, State, Action, Affection → SYMBAINONTA
- Relation (social) → DOXA
The five Stoic categories collapse Aristotle's ten into functional groups.
This suggests the five are comprehensive relative to Aristotelian metaphysics.
HONEST ASSESSMENT OF COMPREHENSIVENESS
Strengths:
- ✓ Covers all externals I can generate through testing
- ✓ Aligns with ancient Stoic examples
- ✓ Logically derived from prohairesis/external distinction
- ✓ Works in practice for scenario analysis
Limitations:
- Not explicitly attested in ancient sources - I'm systematizing implicit patterns
- SYMBAINONTA is a catch-all - "events/circumstances" is very broad
- DOXA arguably reducible to ALLOI - reputation is subset of others' judgments
- Some situations involve multiple categories - not perfectly mutually exclusive
Could it be simplified?
Possibly to THREE categories:
- Your body (SOMA)
- Other things/people (KTĒMATA + ALLOI + DOXA)
- Events/outcomes (SYMBAINONTA)
Or even TWO:
- States (body, possessions, people as they are)
- Events (what happens)
Could it need expansion?
Possibly add:
- CHRONOS (time as distinct from events)
- TOPOS (place/location as distinct from events)
But these seem reducible to SYMBAINONTA (temporal/spatial circumstances).
THE REAL TEST: DOES IT WORK FOR THE SLE?
For the SLE's purposes, the five categories are comprehensive IF:
- Every correspondence failure can be mapped to at least one category ✓
- LLMs validate externals across all categories ✓
- The SLE can audit against all categories ✓
- No externals escape categorization (as far as testing shows) ✓
Practical sufficiency ≠ Logical proof of completeness
I can't prove these five are exhaustive in some absolute sense. But I can show:
- They work in practice
- They align with ancient sources
- They cover all test cases
- They provide a complete audit framework
That's good enough for operational purposes, even if not philosophically airtight.
The honest answer: I'm claiming practical comprehensiveness (covers all cases I can test), not logical necessity (provably the only possible categorization).


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home