# The Thomistic Foundation: Aquinas' *Summa Theologica* and Sterling's Six Philosophical Commitments
**A Critical Analysis of How Medieval Synthesis Enables and Complicates Contemporary Stoic Practice**
---
## ABSTRACT
This paper examines how Thomas Aquinas' *Summa Theologica* provides sophisticated versions of all six philosophical commitments that underlie Professor Grant Sterling's contemporary Stoic system: substance dualism, libertarian free will, ethical intuitionism, foundationalism, correspondence theory of truth, and moral realism. While Aquinas offers perhaps the most systematic and rigorous defense of these positions in the history of philosophy, his theological framework both strengthens and potentially undermines Sterling's secular approach to guaranteed happiness through virtue alone. The analysis reveals that Thomistic natural law theory provides the strongest possible foundation for objective virtue ethics, while raising critical questions about whether purely philosophical methods can deliver what theological frameworks guarantee. This investigation contributes to understanding both the historical development of virtue ethics and the philosophical requirements for systematic approaches to human flourishing.
**Keywords:** Thomas Aquinas, Stoicism, virtue ethics, natural law, philosophical psychology, moral realism
---
## I. INTRODUCTION: THE THOMISTIC CHALLENGE TO SECULAR STOICISM
Professor Grant Sterling's contemporary approach to Stoicism rests on six foundational philosophical commitments that enable his promise of systematic happiness through rational virtue development. These commitments—substance dualism, libertarian free will, ethical intuitionism, foundationalism, correspondence theory of truth, and moral realism—require sophisticated theoretical justification to support Sterling's confident claims about guaranteed psychological results.
Thomas Aquinas' *Summa Theologica* presents the most systematic medieval defense of precisely these philosophical positions, integrated within a comprehensive theological framework that addresses both natural and supernatural dimensions of human existence. This creates a paradox for Sterling's system: Aquinas provides the strongest possible theoretical foundation for Sterling's commitments while embedding them within assumptions that may be incompatible with Sterling's secular methodology.
The *Summa* represents the culmination of medieval efforts to synthesize Aristotelian philosophy with Christian revelation, producing what many consider the most systematic account of human nature, moral knowledge, and divine governance in Western philosophy. For Sterling's approach, this raises fundamental questions: Can the philosophical insights that Aquinas develops within theological context maintain their force when detached from their divine foundations? Or does the Thomistic synthesis reveal that systematic virtue ethics requires metaphysical commitments that exceed what purely secular philosophy can justify?
This paper argues that while Aquinas provides unparalleled support for Sterling's six commitments, the theological framework that enables this support also exposes potential limitations in any secular approach to guaranteed human flourishing. The *Summa* demonstrates both the power and the problems of foundationalist virtue ethics, offering insights essential for evaluating Sterling's contemporary project.
**The Structure of Analysis**
The investigation proceeds through systematic examination of how each of Sterling's six commitments appears in Aquinas' work, followed by analysis of their systematic integration and implications for secular Stoic practice. Special attention focuses on the tension between Aquinas' theological foundations and Sterling's philosophical methodology, with assessment of whether this tension undermines or strengthens Sterling's approach.
The central thesis maintains that Aquinas' *Summa Theologica* reveals both the ultimate promise and the fundamental challenge facing any systematic approach to virtue ethics: while objective moral truth and guaranteed human flourishing become theoretically possible within comprehensive metaphysical frameworks, the very comprehensiveness that enables these guarantees may exceed what human reason can establish independently of revelation or faith.
---
## II. SUBSTANCE DUALISM: THE RATIONAL SOUL AS SUBSISTENT FORM
### **Aquinas' Synthesis of Aristotelian and Platonic Elements**
The *Summa Theologica* develops a sophisticated position on the mind-body relationship that attempts to preserve both Aristotelian insights about psychosomatic unity and Christian requirements for personal immortality. Aquinas' doctrine of the soul as "subsistent form" represents one of the most philosophically rigorous attempts to maintain genuine substance dualism while avoiding the interaction problems that plague Cartesian approaches.
In *Summa Theologica* I, q.75, Aquinas establishes that the human soul is both the substantial form of the body and a subsistent substance capable of separate existence. This dual characterization enables him to maintain that human beings are genuine unities (not souls imprisoned in bodies) while preserving the soul's essential independence from material conditions.
The argument proceeds through careful analysis of intellectual operations. Since the intellect can know universal concepts and immaterial truths, it cannot be the act of any bodily organ: "The intellectual soul is incorruptible... since nothing is corrupted except by the separation of its form from matter" (ST I, q.75, a.6). Yet because intellectual knowledge depends on sensory input in this life, the soul is naturally united to body as its proper form.
### **The Metaphysical Structure of Human Nature**
Aquinas' analysis reveals human nature as existing at the boundary between material and spiritual reality. The rational soul contains within itself the powers of lower forms (vegetative and sensitive) while transcending them through intellectual and volitional capacities that operate independently of material conditions.
This metaphysical analysis has direct implications for understanding personal identity and moral responsibility. Your essential self consists in your rational soul—the principle of intellectual and volitional activity that defines human nature. While you are not merely a soul using a body (against Platonic dualism), neither are you merely a complex physical system (against materialist reductionism).
The *Summa* argues that intellectual operations provide evidence for the soul's subsistent nature. When you understand universal concepts like justice or truth, or when you reflect on your own mental states, you perform operations that transcend the limitations of material organs. These activities reveal the presence of an immaterial principle that, while naturally united to body, can operate independently of bodily conditions.
### **Implications for Sterling's Control Dichotomy**
Sterling's foundational distinction between what is "up to us" and what is "not up to us" requires some form of substance dualism to be philosophically coherent. If human persons are merely complex physical systems, then "mental discipline" becomes meaningless—you cannot control your responses to external circumstances because you simply are the result of prior physical causes operating through your nervous system.
Aquinas' sophisticated dualism provides systematic justification for Sterling's approach. The rational soul's subsistent nature means that your essential capacities for judgment and choice transcend the causal networks that govern material events. While external circumstances affect your body and sensory experience, they cannot directly determine your intellectual and volitional responses.
This analysis explains why Sterling can promise systematic results through mental training. The rational soul's operations follow different causal principles than material events. Through proper understanding and disciplined practice, you can align your judgment and desire with objective truth about human flourishing, achieving stable happiness regardless of external circumstances.
### **The Theological Complication**
However, Aquinas' dualism emerges within a theological framework that may complicate its application to Sterling's secular approach. The soul's subsistent nature is demonstrated partly through its capacity for supernatural operations—knowing and loving God directly. The complete human good involves beatific vision, which exceeds what natural reason and virtue can achieve.
This raises questions about whether Aquinas' arguments for substantial dualism maintain their force when detached from theological context. If the soul's highest operations involve supernatural rather than natural objects, can purely philosophical training deliver the complete happiness that Sterling promises? Or does Aquinas' analysis reveal that human nature requires divine completion for perfect fulfillment?
### **Contemporary Philosophical Assessment**
From the perspective of contemporary philosophy of mind, Aquinas' position faces familiar challenges about mental causation and the unity of consciousness. How can an immaterial soul interact causally with material brain processes? How can intellectual operations that transcend material conditions nonetheless depend on sensory input for their content?
Yet Aquinas' sophisticated analysis of these problems may offer resources unavailable to cruder forms of dualism. His account of the soul as substantial form rather than separate substance avoids some interaction problems, while his analysis of intellectual abstraction explains how immaterial operations can depend on material conditions without being reducible to them.
For Sterling's system, these metaphysical complexities matter primarily for their practical implications. Can rational agents actually achieve the kind of systematic control over their responses that Sterling's method requires? Aquinas' careful analysis suggests positive answers, but within a framework that may require theological supplementation for complete success.
---
## III. LIBERTARIAN FREE WILL: THE METAPHYSICS OF RATIONAL CHOICE
### **The Structure of Free Choice in Thomistic Psychology**
Perhaps nowhere does the *Summa Theologica* provide stronger support for Sterling's commitments than in its analysis of free choice (*liberum arbitrium*). Aquinas develops the most sophisticated medieval account of how rational agents can exercise genuine causal control over their decisions, providing systematic justification for moral responsibility and character development.
The Thomistic analysis begins with the relationship between intellect and will in rational choice. Unlike purely sensory appetite, which responds necessarily to perceived goods, the rational will can choose among alternatives because intellect presents multiple possibilities as choiceworthy: "Free choice is the faculty of the will and reason; and such a faculty belongs to each person by virtue of his having a rational nature" (ST I, q.83, a.1).
This freedom emerges from the gap between universal desire and particular choice. The will necessarily desires happiness in general, but no finite good can compel choice because rational analysis reveals the limitations of every particular option. Only the infinite good could necessitate the will's response, and such perfect good is unavailable as an object of choice in earthly life.
### **The Mechanism of Self-Determination**
Aquinas provides detailed analysis of how genuine self-determination operates through the interaction of cognitive and appetitive powers. The process involves several distinct but coordinated activities:
**Apprehension**: Intellect grasps various possibilities as potential objects of choice, recognizing their relationships to human flourishing and their inherent limitations.
**Deliberation**: Practical reason examines alternatives, considering their consequences and their conformity to rational principles about genuine good.
**Judgment**: Intellect reaches conclusions about which alternative best promotes authentic human flourishing in particular circumstances.
**Choice**: Will freely determines itself toward the alternative that practical reason presents as most choiceworthy, though it retains the capacity to choose otherwise.
**Execution**: The chosen alternative is pursued through commanded acts that involve bodily powers under reason's direction.
This analysis reveals genuine agency at multiple levels. You are not merely responding to the strongest desire or following predetermined patterns, but actively determining yourself through rational reflection and voluntary commitment.
### **Freedom and Divine Causality**
One of the most sophisticated aspects of Aquinas' treatment involves reconciling human freedom with divine omniscience and providence. The *Summa* argues that God's eternal perspective and primary causality enhance rather than diminish human freedom.
Divine foreknowledge does not compromise freedom because God's eternity transcends temporal succession. From the eternal perspective, human choices are not "foreseen" but eternally present, without this presence causing or determining the choices themselves (ST I, q.14, a.13).
Similarly, divine causality operates at the level of primary causation, enabling rather than competing with secondary causes like human choice. God causes the existence and operation of human nature, including its capacity for free choice, without determining the specific content of individual decisions.
This framework provides stronger support for libertarian freedom than purely naturalistic approaches because it grounds freedom in the divine gift of rational nature while preserving genuine secondary causation in human choice.
### **Implications for Character Development**
The Thomistic analysis of freedom has direct implications for understanding how character development occurs through repeated choices. Since you genuinely control your responses to circumstances, consistent good choices can actually reshape your desires and habits over time.
Aquinas explains this through his account of virtue acquisition. Moral virtues develop through repeated acts that gradually incline the appetitive powers toward rational judgment. As you consistently choose courageously, for example, your emotional responses to danger become properly ordered, making subsequent acts of courage easier and more spontaneous.
This process requires genuine agency because virtue cannot be imposed externally. You must understand why courage is choiceworthy and voluntarily commit to courageous action for authentic virtue to develop. Mere behavioral modification without rational engagement produces only apparent virtue that lacks stability and merit.
### **The Sterling Connection: Systematic Freedom**
Sterling's entire therapeutic method depends on the claim that you can systematically control your assent to impressions through disciplined rational training. Aquinas provides the most rigorous philosophical foundation for this claim through his analysis of how free choice operates in rational beings.
When Sterling argues that you can choose to reject false value judgments about externals, he is relying on exactly the kind of analysis Aquinas provides. Your will is not determined by the apparent attractiveness of external goods because practical reason can recognize their limitations and direct choice toward virtue as the genuine good.
The systematic nature of Sterling's approach also finds support in Thomistic psychology. Because freedom operates through rational principles rather than arbitrary whim, consistent application of correct principles must produce predictable results in character development and emotional response.
### **Potential Complications: Grace and Nature**
However, Aquinas' analysis includes theological elements that complicate its application to purely secular approaches. The *Summa* distinguishes between natural and supernatural virtue, arguing that fallen human nature requires divine grace for consistent choice of genuine good.
While natural reason can discover moral truth and natural will can choose particular goods, sustained virtue in fallen conditions requires divine assistance: "Man cannot love God above all things with natural love unless he is healed by grace" (ST I-II, q.109, a.3).
This raises questions about whether Sterling's confidence in purely rational training methods is justified within Thomistic frameworks. If human nature is wounded by sin and requires supernatural healing for consistent virtue, can philosophical discipline alone deliver the systematic results Sterling promises?
### **Contemporary Philosophical Context**
From the perspective of contemporary philosophy, Aquinas' defense of libertarian freedom faces standard objections about determinism and the consequence argument. If human choices are caused by prior states plus laws of nature, in what sense are agents ultimately responsible for their decisions?
Yet Aquinas' analysis of primary and secondary causation may provide resources for addressing these challenges. Human choices are indeed caused—by rational agents exercising their natural capacities for self-determination. The question is not whether choices are caused, but whether they are caused by agents themselves through genuine rational activity.
For Sterling's purposes, the key insight is that rational training can actually modify the causal factors that influence choice. By developing practical wisdom and moral virtue, you change what appears choiceworthy and how you respond to apparent goods. This provides systematic leverage for character transformation that purely libertarian approaches might lack.
---
## IV. ETHICAL INTUITIONISM: NATURAL LAW AND PRACTICAL REASON
### **The Structure of Moral Knowledge in Natural Law Theory**
The *Summa Theologica* presents one of the most sophisticated accounts of how rational beings can achieve reliable knowledge of moral truth through natural reason. Aquinas' natural law theory provides systematic justification for ethical intuitionism while avoiding subjectivist and relativist implications that undermine objective moral knowledge.
The foundation of Thomistic moral epistemology lies in the doctrine of natural law as rational creatures' participation in eternal law. Aquinas argues that practical reason naturally grasps fundamental moral principles in the same way theoretical reason grasps logical principles: "The precepts of the natural law are to the practical reason what the first principles of demonstrations are to the speculative reason" (ST I-II, q.94, a.2).
This parallel between practical and theoretical reason is crucial for understanding how moral knowledge can be both intuitive and objective. Just as intellect directly apprehends logical principles like non-contradiction without requiring prior demonstration, practical reason directly grasps moral principles like "good should be done and evil avoided" without requiring external validation.
### **The Hierarchy of Moral Principles**
Aquinas develops a sophisticated account of how moral knowledge operates at different levels of generality and certainty. The natural law includes:
**Primary Precepts**: Self-evident principles that all rational beings recognize immediately, such as preserving life, living in society, seeking truth, and worshipping God. These precepts correspond to fundamental inclinations of human nature and admit no exceptions or cultural variation.
**Secondary Precepts**: More specific conclusions derived from primary principles through rational reflection, such as prohibitions against murder, theft, and adultery. These generally apply universally but may admit exceptions in unusual circumstances.
**Tertiary Determinations**: Particular applications of universal principles to specific social and cultural contexts, such as detailed legal codes and customs. These may vary legitimately across communities while remaining grounded in universal principles.
This hierarchical structure explains how moral knowledge can be both objective and contextual. The fundamental structure of morality remains constant because it reflects universal features of rational nature, while specific applications require prudential judgment about particular circumstances.
### **Synderesis and Practical Wisdom**
Aquinas introduces the concept of *synderesis* to explain how practical reason grasps fundamental moral principles directly. *Synderesis* is a natural habit of practical intellect that intuitively recognizes basic moral truths: "Synderesis is said to incite to good and murmur at evil, inasmuch as through first principles we proceed to discover, and judge of what we have discovered" (ST I, q.79, a.12).
This intellectual habit works in coordination with *prudentia* (practical wisdom) to achieve complete moral knowledge. While *synderesis* grasps universal principles, *prudentia* applies them correctly to particular circumstances through trained judgment that develops through experience and reflection.
The integration of these cognitive capacities explains how moral knowledge can be both immediate and developed. You naturally recognize fundamental moral truths, but achieving practical wisdom requires sustained rational effort to understand how universal principles apply in complex particular situations.
### **The Objective Foundation: Participation in Eternal Law**
What makes Thomistic moral epistemology genuinely realist rather than projectivist is its foundation in eternal law—God's rational governance of creation toward ultimate ends. Natural law represents rational creatures' participation in this eternal law through their capacity to understand and voluntarily conform to the divine plan.
This participation is not merely conventional or constructed but reflects the objective structure of reality as ordered by divine wisdom. When practical reason grasps moral truth, it discovers rather than creates the rational order that governs authentic human flourishing: "The natural law is nothing else than the rational creature's participation of the eternal law" (ST I-II, q.91, a.2).
The theological foundation provides systematic justification for confident moral knowledge. You can trust practical reason's deliverances about moral truth because they reflect objective features of reality established by divine wisdom rather than arbitrary human preferences or cultural constructions.
### **The Sterling Connection: Confident Value Judgments**
Sterling's therapeutic method requires confidence that reason can distinguish between genuine and false value judgments. When he claims that virtue is objectively better than external goods, he needs philosophical justification for treating this as discovered truth rather than arbitrary preference.
Aquinas' natural law theory provides exactly this justification. Practical reason can reliably identify virtue as genuine good because virtue perfects rational nature according to its objective ordering toward ultimate end. External goods may support virtuous activity but cannot constitute human flourishing because they do not perfect what is most essential in human nature.
This analysis explains why Sterling can promise systematic results through rational training. When you align your value judgments with natural law, you conform to objective reality about what promotes authentic human flourishing. This conformity produces stable happiness because it reflects the actual structure of rational nature rather than conventional expectations or personal preferences.
### **The Development of Moral Knowledge**
Aquinas provides detailed analysis of how moral knowledge develops through the interaction of natural endowment and rational cultivation. While all rational beings possess *synderesis* and can recognize fundamental moral principles, achieving practical wisdom requires sustained effort:
**Natural Foundation**: *Synderesis* provides immediate recognition of basic moral truths that serve as starting points for moral reasoning.
**Rational Development**: Through reflection on experience and systematic study of moral principles, practical reason develops more sophisticated understanding of how universal truths apply to particular circumstances.
**Habitual Perfection**: Repeated good choices guided by correct moral knowledge gradually perfect the appetitive powers, making virtue more spontaneous and reliable.
**Social Confirmation**: Moral reasoning develops through dialogue with others and exposure to the accumulated wisdom of moral traditions.
This developmental account explains how moral intuition and rational argument work together rather than competing. Intuitive recognition of moral truth provides the foundation, while systematic reflection develops and applies this foundation to achieve practical wisdom.
### **Challenges and Complications**
The theological foundation of Thomistic moral epistemology creates potential difficulties for secular applications. If moral knowledge depends on participation in eternal law, can purely philosophical approaches achieve the reliability that Sterling's system requires?
Aquinas argues that natural reason can discover significant moral truth independently of revelation, but questions remain about whether this natural knowledge suffices for complete practical guidance. The *Summa* distinguishes between natural and supernatural virtue, suggesting that fallen human reason may require divine assistance for consistent moral knowledge.
Additionally, the relationship between universal principles and particular applications remains complex. While *synderesis* grasps universal truths reliably, practical wisdom in particular circumstances requires experience and judgment that may be fallible. This introduces potential uncertainty into moral reasoning that could undermine Sterling's confident claims about systematic results.
### **Contemporary Philosophical Assessment**
From the perspective of contemporary metaethics, Aquinas' natural law theory faces standard objections about the relationship between facts and values. Can moral conclusions really follow from descriptive premises about human nature? Does the appeal to divine eternal law solve or merely postpone questions about objective moral truth?
Yet Thomistic natural law theory may avoid some difficulties that plague other realist approaches. By grounding moral truth in rational nature as established by divine wisdom, Aquinas provides both ontological foundation and epistemological access for objective moral knowledge.
For Sterling's system, the key insight is that practical reason can achieve reliable knowledge about what promotes authentic human flourishing. Whether this reliability requires theological foundations or can be maintained through purely philosophical analysis remains a crucial question for evaluating secular approaches to systematic virtue ethics.
---
## V. FOUNDATIONALISM: SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY AS METHODOLOGICAL MODEL
### **The Architectural Structure of the Summa**
The *Summa Theologica* represents perhaps the most comprehensive example of foundationalist methodology in the history of philosophy. Aquinas constructs a systematic account of reality, knowledge, and morality from clearly established first principles, demonstrating how complex conclusions can follow necessarily from evident starting points.
The foundational structure operates at multiple levels within the *Summa*. At the most basic level, Aquinas relies on self-evident principles of theoretical reason—non-contradiction, causality, and the principle that being and intelligibility are convertible. These logical foundations enable demonstration of God's existence, attributes, and creative activity.
At the theological level, articles of faith provide additional certain starting points that exceed what unaided reason can discover. Sacred doctrine proceeds from principles "established by the light of a higher science, namely, the science of God and the blessed" (ST I, q.1, a.2). This creates a hierarchical structure where revealed truth supplements rather than contradicts rational knowledge.
The methodological sophistication appears in how Aquinas integrates rational demonstration with theological authority. Natural reason establishes what can be proven independently, while faith provides additional premises that enable systematic treatment of supernatural truths. Both sources yield genuine knowledge, though through different cognitive procedures.
### **Demonstrative Knowledge and Probable Reasoning**
Aquinas distinguishes carefully between different types of reasoning appropriate to different subject matters. When dealing with necessary truths about divine nature and logical principles, strict demonstration provides certain conclusions from evident premises.
However, in matters of practical reasoning and theological application, Aquinas often employs probable reasoning that proceeds from reputable opinions (*opiniones probabiles*) and converging lines of evidence rather than strict logical necessity.
This methodological flexibility allows the *Summa* to maintain foundationalist rigor while acknowledging the limitations of human reason in particular domains. The overall system rests on certain foundations, but specific applications may require prudential judgment that admits degrees of probability rather than absolute certainty.
### **The Integration of Aristotelian and Christian Elements**
One of the most impressive features of Thomistic foundationalism is its successful integration of Aristotelian philosophical method with Christian theological content. Aquinas demonstrates that systematic rational inquiry and revealed truth can be synthesized without compromising the integrity of either source.
The philosophical foundations derive primarily from Aristotelian logic and metaphysics, providing rigorous methods for analyzing causation, substance, knowledge, and practical reasoning. These foundations enable systematic treatment of questions about God's existence, human nature, moral principles, and political organization.
The theological superstructure builds on these philosophical foundations while extending beyond what unaided reason can achieve. Truths about Trinity, Incarnation, sacramental grace, and supernatural beatitude require revelatory premises, but they can be systematically analyzed using philosophical methods once the premises are established.
This integration provides a methodological model for how foundationalist approaches can incorporate both rational and non-rational sources of knowledge while maintaining systematic coherence.
### **The Sterling Connection: Systematic Certainty**
Sterling's approach to Stoicism claims to provide systematic knowledge about human flourishing that generates predictable results through disciplined application. This confidence requires some form of foundationalist methodology that can establish reliable conclusions from evident starting points.
Aquinas provides the most sophisticated model for how such systematic approaches can operate. The *Summa* demonstrates that complex practical conclusions can be rigorously derived from basic truths about human nature and its relationship to ultimate reality.
Sterling's foundational principles—the control dichotomy, the sufficiency of virtue, the objectivity of value—function analogously to Thomistic starting points. If these principles can be established with sufficient certainty, then systematic conclusions about emotional freedom and character development should follow necessarily.
The Thomistic model also suggests how foundationalist approaches can maintain both systematic rigor and practical flexibility. Universal principles provide the foundation, while their application to particular circumstances requires prudential judgment that may admit varying degrees of certainty.
### **The Question of Starting Points**
However, Aquinas' foundationalism raises crucial questions about the status of its starting points. While the *Summa* claims to proceed from self-evident rational principles and divinely revealed truths, critics might question whether these foundations are as secure as Aquinas assumes.
In the case of rational principles, contemporary philosophy has raised questions about whether any substantive truths can be established as genuinely self-evident. Logical principles like non-contradiction may be necessary for coherent thought, but do they license the kind of metaphysical conclusions Aquinas derives from them?
In the case of revealed truths, the foundations depend on accepting the authority of Scripture and Church tradition. While Aquinas provides sophisticated arguments for the credibility of Christian revelation, these arguments may not establish the kind of certainty that strict foundationalism requires.
For Sterling's system, these questions become crucial. Can the foundational principles of Stoic value theory be established with sufficient certainty to support the systematic conclusions Sterling derives from them? Or do they rest on assumptions that exceed what purely philosophical analysis can justify?
### **The Role of Authority and Tradition**
Aquinas' foundationalism operates within a framework that acknowledges the legitimate role of authority and tradition in establishing starting points. Sacred doctrine relies on scriptural authority as interpreted by ecclesiastical tradition, while philosophical reasoning builds on the accumulated insights of previous thinkers.
This creates tension with more radical forms of foundationalism that attempt to establish certain knowledge through individual rational reflection alone. Aquinas suggests that reliable knowledge requires both rational analysis and appropriate reliance on authoritative sources that exceed individual cognitive capacity.
The implication for Sterling's approach is complex. On one hand, Stoic value theory builds on insights from the classical philosophical tradition rather than proceeding from purely individual reflection. On the other hand, Sterling's secular methodology cannot appeal to the kind of divine authority that stabilizes Thomistic foundations.
### **Systematic Coherence and Explanatory Power**
One strength of Thomistic foundationalism lies in its systematic coherence and comprehensive explanatory power. The *Summa* provides unified treatment of metaphysical, epistemological, ethical, and political questions within a single theoretical framework.
This systematic integration enables powerful mutual confirmation among different parts of the system. Conclusions in one domain support and illuminate conclusions in other domains, creating cumulative evidence for the overall framework that exceeds what any single argument could provide.
Sterling's approach exhibits similar systematic aspirations. The control dichotomy, value theory, and therapeutic techniques form an integrated system where each element supports the others. Success in emotional regulation confirms the truth of Stoic value judgments, while understanding correct values enables more effective practical techniques.
The question is whether Sterling's philosophical foundations can sustain this systematic integration without the theological superstructure that stabilizes Thomistic synthesis. Can purely secular philosophy provide sufficient unity and explanatory power to support systematic approaches to human flourishing?
### **Contemporary Challenges to Foundationalism**
From the perspective of contemporary epistemology, Thomistic foundationalism faces familiar objections about the possibility of certain knowledge and the problem of infinite regress. If every belief requires justification, how can any beliefs serve as ultimate foundations? If some beliefs are self-justifying, how do we distinguish genuine self-evidence from mere psychological conviction?
Additionally, the historical contingency of Aquinas' starting points raises questions about their universal validity. The integration of Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology reflects particular historical circumstances rather than timeless rational necessities.
Yet Aquinas' sophisticated treatment of these issues may provide resources that cruder foundationalisms lack. His account of how different types of reasoning apply to different subject matters, and his integration of rational and authoritative sources, suggest more flexible approaches to systematic knowledge than strict foundationalism typically allows.
For Sterling's purposes, the crucial insight is that systematic approaches to practical wisdom may require some form of foundationalist confidence in basic principles, even if these foundations cannot be established with absolute theoretical certainty. The practical success of the system may provide pragmatic validation for its foundational assumptions.
---
## VI. CORRESPONDENCE THEORY OF TRUTH: TRUTH AS ADEQUATION
### **The Classical Formulation**
The *Summa Theologica* provides the classic medieval statement of correspondence theory through Aquinas' famous definition: "Truth is the equation of thing and intellect" (*Veritas est adaequatio rei et intellectus*) (ST I, q.16, a.1). This formulation establishes correspondence as the fundamental nature of truth while recognizing the complex relationships involved in cognitive adequation to reality.
Aquinas develops this basic insight through systematic analysis of different types of truth and their corresponding forms of adequation. Truth involves conformity between cognitive capacity and objective reality, but this conformity operates differently across various cognitive activities and objects of knowledge.
The sophistication of Thomistic correspondence theory lies in its recognition that truth involves active intellectual engagement rather than passive mirroring. When intellect achieves truth, it actively conforms itself to the intelligible structure of reality through cognitive operations that participate in rather than merely copy objective truth.
### **The Metaphysical Foundation: Divine Truth as Exemplar**
What distinguishes Thomistic correspondence theory from purely naturalistic versions is its foundation in divine truth as the exemplar and measure of all finite truth. God's knowledge serves as the creative principle that establishes the intelligible structure of reality, while created intellects achieve truth by conforming to this divinely established order.
This creates a complex hierarchy of truth relationships:
**Divine Truth**: God's knowledge is truth itself, serving as the creative exemplar that establishes the intelligible structure of all reality.
**Ontological Truth**: Created things are true insofar as they conform to their divine exemplars and fulfill their essential natures.
**Logical Truth**: Created intellects achieve truth by conforming to the intelligible structure that divine wisdom has established in reality.
**Practical Truth**: Human reason and will achieve truth by conforming to the objective order of good established by divine providence.
This hierarchical structure provides systematic justification for correspondence theory by grounding it in the fundamental relationship between divine creativity and created participation.
### **Logical Truth and Intellectual Adequation**
In the domain of speculative knowledge, Aquinas analyzes how intellect achieves adequation to reality through the formation of concepts and judgments that correspond to objective features of the world. This process involves several distinct cognitive operations:
**Simple Apprehension**: Intellect forms concepts that correspond to the essential natures of things, abstracting universal intelligible content from particular sensory presentations.
**Judgment**: Intellect combines or separates concepts in ways that correspond to actual relationships among things, affirming or denying connections that exist in reality.
**Reasoning**: Intellect draws conclusions that follow necessarily from premises, maintaining logical adequation throughout inferential processes.
The correspondence relationship operates differently at each level. Concepts achieve adequation by capturing essential features of their objects, judgments achieve adequation by correctly asserting or denying real relationships, and reasoning achieves adequation by preserving truth through valid inferential procedures.
### **Practical Truth and Moral Adequation**
Aquinas extends correspondence analysis to practical reasoning and moral judgment, arguing that practical truth involves adequation between reason and the objective order of good established by divine wisdom. Practical reason achieves truth when it correctly identifies what promotes authentic human flourishing according to natural law.
This analysis has direct implications for moral epistemology. Value judgments can be objectively true or false depending on whether they correspond to the actual relationship between particular goods and human nature as established by divine providence: "The rule and measure of human acts is the reason, which is the first principle of human acts" (ST I-II, q.90, a.1).
The correspondence relationship in practical reasoning operates through several coordinated activities:
**Recognition of Natural Inclinations**: Practical reason identifies fundamental human inclinations that reveal the objective structure of good established in human nature.
**Evaluation of Particular Goods**: Practical reason assesses how particular objects relate to authentic human flourishing, distinguishing genuine from apparent goods.
**Prudential Judgment**: Practical wisdom determines how universal principles apply in particular circumstances, achieving adequation to the concrete requirements of virtue in specific situations.
This account explains how moral knowledge can be both objective and practical. When you correctly judge that virtue is more choiceworthy than external goods, your judgment corresponds to objective truth about what perfects rational nature according to its divine ordering.
### **The Problem of Error and Correction**
Thomistic correspondence theory includes sophisticated analysis of how intellectual error occurs and how it can be corrected through better adequation to reality. Error results from inadequate cognitive engagement with objective truth rather than from subjective or conventional factors.
In speculative matters, error occurs when intellect fails to achieve adequate abstraction from sensory conditions, when judgment incorrectly combines or separates concepts, or when reasoning violates logical principles that govern valid inference.
In practical matters, error occurs when reason fails to recognize genuine good, when appetitive disorder prevents correct moral judgment, or when prudential reasoning misapplies universal principles to particular circumstances.
The systematic nature of truth enables correction of error through improved cognitive procedures. Since truth involves adequation to objective reality, better intellectual methods should produce more reliable cognitive results over time.
### **The Sterling Connection: Objective Value Judgments**
Sterling's therapeutic method depends crucially on the claim that some value judgments correspond to objective reality while others involve systematic error about what promotes human flourishing. This requires some version of correspondence theory that enables confident distinction between true and false practical judgments.
Aquinas provides sophisticated justification for this confidence. Natural law theory establishes that practical reason can achieve reliable adequation to objective truth about human good when it operates correctly according to rational principles.
When Sterling argues that preferring virtue over externals represents true rather than arbitrary judgment, he relies on exactly the kind of analysis Aquinas provides. The judgment corresponds to objective reality about what perfects rational nature according to its essential ordering toward ultimate good.
The systematic character of Stoic training also finds support in Thomistic correspondence theory. Since practical truth involves adequation to objective reality, systematic methods for improving practical reasoning should produce predictable results in achieving correct value judgments and stable emotional responses.
### **Truth and Certainty in Practical Reasoning**
The relationship between correspondence theory and practical certainty raises important questions for Sterling's system. While Aquinas argues that practical reason can achieve reliable adequation to moral truth, he also recognizes that practical reasoning admits varying degrees of certainty depending on the level of generality and the complexity of circumstances.
Universal moral principles achieve high certainty because they correspond to necessary features of rational nature. More particular applications require prudential judgment that may involve probability rather than strict certainty. This creates potential tension with Sterling's confident claims about systematic results through rational training.
However, Aquinas' analysis suggests that sufficient practical certainty is achievable for reliable moral guidance. While particular judgments may be fallible, consistent application of correct principles over time should produce stable adequation to moral truth and corresponding improvement in character and emotional response.
### **Contemporary Challenges to Correspondence Theory**
From the perspective of contemporary philosophy, Thomistic correspondence theory faces familiar objections about the nature of truth and the possibility of objective knowledge. How can finite intellects achieve genuine adequation to infinite reality? What ensures that our cognitive procedures track truth rather than merely producing coherent beliefs?
Additionally, the theological foundation of Thomistic correspondence theory may seem problematic from secular perspectives. If correspondence depends on divine exemplarity and providence, can purely naturalistic approaches maintain confidence in objective truth?
Yet Aquinas' sophisticated analysis may provide resources that cruder correspondence theories lack. His account of participated truth and his recognition of different types of adequation suggest more flexible approaches to objectivity than simple mirroring theories typically allow.
For Sterling's purposes, the crucial insight is that practical reasoning can achieve sufficient adequation to objective reality about human flourishing to enable reliable moral guidance. Whether this adequation requires theological foundations or can be maintained through purely philosophical analysis remains a central question.
---
## VII. MORAL REALISM: THE OBJECTIVE FOUNDATION OF VIRTUE ETHICS
### **Natural Law as Objective Moral Order**
The *Summa Theologica* provides perhaps the most systematic defense of moral realism in medieval philosophy through its comprehensive natural law theory. Aquinas argues that moral truth reflects objective features of reality established by divine wisdom rather than conventional agreement or subjective preference.
The foundation of Thomistic moral realism lies in the doctrine of eternal law as God's rational governance of creation toward ultimate ends. This eternal law establishes objective purposes and relationships that constitute the fundamental structure of moral reality: "Law is nothing else than an ordinance of reason for the common good, made by him who has care of the community, and promulgated" (ST I-II, q.90, a.4).
Natural law represents rational creatures' participation in eternal law through their capacity to understand and voluntarily conform to the objective order established by divine providence. This participation makes moral knowledge both possible and reliable because it involves cognitive access to real features of the moral order rather than construction of arbitrary values.
### **The Metaphysical Structure of Human Nature**
Aquinas grounds moral realism in systematic analysis of human nature as established by divine creative activity. Human beings have objective essential structure that determines what constitutes authentic flourishing and what promotes or hinders the achievement of natural ends.
This essential structure includes several fundamental inclinations that reveal the objective hierarchy of goods:
**Inclination to Self-Preservation**: Shared with all substances, grounding duties regarding life and health
**Inclination to Species Propagation**: Shared with animals, grounding duties regarding family and sexual morality
**Inclination to Rational Activity**: Specific to rational beings, grounding duties regarding truth, society, and divine worship
These inclinations are not merely empirical facts about human psychology but ontological features that reflect how divine wisdom has ordered rational nature toward its appropriate end. Moral principles derive their objectivity from correspondence to this divinely established natural order.
### **Universal Validity and Cultural Application**
One strength of Thomistic moral realism lies in its ability to maintain universal validity while acknowledging legitimate cultural variation in particular applications. The fundamental structure of natural law applies universally because it reflects necessary features of rational nature established by divine wisdom.
However, the application of universal principles to particular circumstances requires prudential judgment that may legitimately vary across different cultural and historical contexts: "The natural law, as to general principles, is the same for all, both as to rectitude and as to knowledge... but as to certain matters of detail, which are conclusions of the general principles, it is the same for all in the majority of cases" (ST I-II, q.94, a.4).
This framework enables Thomistic natural law to avoid both rigid absolutism and cultural relativism. Universal moral principles provide objective standards that transcend cultural particularity, while their concrete application requires practical wisdom that respects legitimate diversity in circumstances and traditions.
### **Virtue and Vice as Objective States**
Aquinas analyzes virtue and vice as objective perfections or corruptions of rational nature that exist independently of individual opinion or cultural approval. Virtue represents the excellent functioning of human capacities according to their natural ordering toward ultimate end, while vice represents dysfunction or misdirection of these same capacities.
This analysis has systematic implications for understanding moral evaluation. When you judge someone as courageous or cowardly, generous or stingy, just or unjust, you are not merely expressing preference or applying cultural categories but recognizing objective features of character that correspond to actual perfection or corruption of rational nature.
The objectivity of virtue and vice explains why moral education and character development can achieve systematic results. Since virtue represents genuine excellence in rational functioning, appropriate training should reliably produce improvement in character and corresponding enhancement of human flourishing.
### **The Relationship Between Natural and Supernatural Good**
Aquinas distinguishes between natural and supernatural dimensions of human good while maintaining their systematic relationship within a unified moral framework. Natural virtue perfects human capacities according to their inherent ordering toward earthly flourishing, while supernatural virtue elevates these same capacities toward participation in divine life.
This distinction creates complexity for applications to secular moral philosophy. While natural law provides objective foundations for moral reasoning that are accessible to unaided human reason, complete human fulfillment requires supernatural elevation that exceeds what natural virtue can achieve.
The implication for Sterling's system is significant. If Thomistic analysis is correct, then purely natural approaches to human flourishing may achieve genuine but incomplete success. Natural virtue produces real improvement in character and emotional stability, but ultimate happiness requires divine grace and supernatural destiny that exceed philosophical competence.
### **The Problem of Moral Disagreement**
Thomistic moral realism faces the familiar challenge of explaining widespread moral disagreement if moral truth is objective and accessible to rational reflection. Aquinas addresses this challenge through analysis of how moral reasoning can be corrupted by various factors:
**Intellectual Error**: Misunderstanding fundamental principles or their applications due to inadequate philosophical training
**Appetitive Disorder**: Emotional and volitional dysfunction that prevents clear moral perception even when intellectual understanding is correct
**Cultural Corruption**: Social institutions and practices that systematically distort moral education and character formation
**Sinful Inclination**: Fallen human nature's tendency toward self-deception and rationalization of disordered behavior
This analysis suggests that moral disagreement results from cognitive and appetitive dysfunction rather than from the absence of objective moral truth. Appropriate intellectual and moral education should reduce disagreement over time by enabling better adequation to objective moral reality.
### **The Sterling Connection: Objective Value Hierarchy**
Sterling's confidence in systematic Stoic training depends on moral realist assumptions about the objective superiority of virtue over external goods. Unless this hierarchy corresponds to reality about human flourishing, Sterling's therapeutic claims become arbitrary preferences without systematic justification.
Aquinas provides comprehensive defense of exactly this kind of objective value hierarchy. Natural law theory demonstrates that virtue occupies the supreme position in any rational ordering of goods because it perfects what is most essential in human nature—rational capacity for knowing and choosing authentic good.
When Sterling argues that preferring reputation over integrity represents objective error rather than legitimate alternative values, he relies on the kind of analysis Aquinas provides. The preference conflicts with natural law because it subordinates higher (rational) goods to lower (external) goods in ways that prevent authentic human flourishing.
The systematic character of Sterling's approach also finds support in Thomistic moral realism. Since virtue represents objective excellence in rational functioning, systematic methods for developing virtue should produce predictable improvements in character and emotional response regardless of individual preferences or cultural expectations.
### **Contemporary Challenges to Moral Realism**
From the perspective of contemporary metaethics, Thomistic moral realism faces standard objections about the relationship between facts and values, the problem of moral motivation, and the challenge of providing naturalistic foundations for normative conclusions.
The theological framework of Aquinas' approach may seem to avoid rather than solve these problems by appealing to divine authority as the foundation for objective moral truth. Critics might argue that this merely relocates rather than answers fundamental questions about the source and nature of moral obligation.
Additionally, contemporary understanding of cultural diversity and historical change raises questions about whether any moral principles can claim the kind of universal validity that natural law theory assumes. The historical contingency of Aquinas' own moral conclusions suggests that claimed universality may reflect particular cultural perspectives rather than objective moral truth.
Yet Thomistic natural law theory may provide resources for addressing these challenges that are unavailable to purely secular approaches. The integration of metaphysical, epistemological, and moral considerations within a unified theoretical framework enables systematic responses to objections that might be decisive against less comprehensive approaches.
### **Implications for Secular Virtue Ethics**
The theological foundations of Thomistic moral realism create both opportunities and problems for secular applications like Sterling's system. On one hand, Aquinas provides the most sophisticated available defense of objective moral truth and its accessibility to rational reflection. On the other hand, this defense operates within theological assumptions that secular approaches cannot adopt.
The question becomes whether the philosophical insights that Aquinas develops within theological context can maintain their force when detached from divine foundations. Can natural law theory support confident moral realism without appeal to eternal law and divine providence? Or does the removal of theological foundations undermine the systematic certainty that makes foundationalist virtue ethics attractive?
This tension reveals a fundamental challenge facing contemporary virtue ethics: the systems that provide strongest theoretical foundations for objective moral truth may require metaphysical commitments that exceed what secular philosophy can justify, while approaches that restrict themselves to naturalistic assumptions may lack the systematic certainty needed for confident practical guidance.
---
## VIII. SYSTEMATIC INTEGRATION: THE THEOLOGICAL SYNTHESIS
### **How the Six Commitments Work Together in Aquinas**
The philosophical power of the *Summa Theologica* lies not in its treatment of individual doctrines but in their systematic integration within a comprehensive theological framework. Aquinas demonstrates how substance dualism, libertarian free will, ethical intuitionism, foundationalism, correspondence theory, and moral realism form a unified system that mutually supports and illuminates each component.
The integration operates through several key relationships:
**Metaphysical Foundation**: Substance dualism establishes that rational souls can operate independently of material conditions, enabling genuine free choice and reliable moral knowledge that transcends physical causation.
**Epistemological Structure**: Correspondence theory and ethical intuitionism work together to provide cognitive access to objective moral truth, while foundationalism ensures systematic derivation of complex conclusions from evident starting points.
**Practical Application**: Libertarian free will and moral realism combine to make character development both possible and objectively beneficial, while natural law provides specific guidance for achieving authentic human flourishing.
This systematic unity explains why Thomistic approaches to virtue ethics can promise systematic results with philosophical confidence. Each commitment supports the others in ways that create cumulative justification for the overall framework.
### **The Divine Guarantee**
What distinguishes Thomistic virtue ethics from purely secular approaches is its theological foundation that provides divine guarantee for the entire system. God's existence, wisdom, and providence ensure that rational pursuit of virtue must succeed in promoting authentic human flourishing.
This guarantee operates at multiple levels:
**Metaphysical**: Divine creation establishes the essential structure of human nature that makes virtue objectively beneficial
**Epistemological**: Divine illumination enables reliable cognitive access to moral truth through natural reason
**Practical**: Divine providence ensures that virtuous choices promote genuine flourishing according to the objective order of creation
**Eschatological**: Divine justice guarantees ultimate vindication of virtue through supernatural beatitude that completes natural happiness
The theological framework thus provides systematic answers to questions that might otherwise undermine confidence in virtue ethics: Why should virtue promote happiness? How can we know what virtue requires? What if virtuous people suffer? Aquinas' comprehensive system addresses each concern through integration of philosophical and theological insights.
### **The Problem of Natural and Supernatural Ends**
However, the theological synthesis also creates potential complications for applications to Sterling's secular approach. Aquinas distinguishes between natural and supernatural dimensions of human good in ways that may undermine purely philosophical approaches to complete happiness.
Natural virtue perfects human capacities according to their inherent ordering and produces genuine but incomplete happiness that is achievable through philosophical discipline and rational training. Supernatural virtue elevates these same capacities toward participation in divine life through grace and produces complete happiness that exceeds what natural reason and effort can achieve.
This distinction raises questions about Sterling's promise that rational virtue development can guarantee complete freedom from suffering and perfect emotional stability. If Thomistic analysis is correct, such complete happiness may require supernatural assistance that purely secular methods cannot provide.
### **Grace, Nature, and Human Effort**
The relationship between divine grace and human effort in character development presents another complication for secular applications of Thomistic insights. Aquinas argues that fallen human nature requires divine assistance for consistent virtue, especially regarding supernatural goods that exceed natural capacity.
While natural reason can discover moral truth and natural will can choose particular goods, sustained virtue often requires divine grace that heals rational capacities corrupted by sin and elevates them toward supernatural objects that exceed natural capacity: "Man cannot love God above all things with natural love unless he is healed by grace" (ST I-II, q.109, a.3).
This analysis potentially undermines Sterling's confidence in purely rational training methods. If human nature is wounded and requires supernatural healing for reliable virtue, can philosophical discipline alone deliver the systematic results that Sterling promises?
Yet Aquinas also argues that significant moral progress is achievable through natural virtue guided by correct practical reasoning. The question becomes whether this natural progress suffices for the kind of emotional freedom and character stability that contemporary Stoicism seeks.
### **The Autonomy of Philosophy**
Despite its theological context, Thomistic natural law theory grants significant autonomy to philosophical reasoning about moral truth and character development. Natural reason can discover substantial moral knowledge independently of revelation, and natural virtue can achieve genuine though incomplete human flourishing.
This partial autonomy suggests that Sterling's secular approach may be able to appropriate Thomistic insights while avoiding commitment to supernatural assumptions. Natural law theory provides objective foundations for virtue ethics that are accessible to unaided rational reflection, even if complete systematic certainty requires theological supplementation.
The question is whether this philosophical autonomy extends far enough to support Sterling's confident claims about systematic results. Can natural reason and natural virtue achieve the kind of reliable character transformation and emotional stability that Sterling's system promises?
---
## IX. CHALLENGES AND COMPLICATIONS: THEOLOGY VERSUS SECULAR PHILOSOPHY
### **The Problem of Secular Foundations**
The most significant challenge facing attempts to apply Thomistic insights to Sterling's secular Stoicism concerns the foundation of the six philosophical commitments within purely naturalistic frameworks. Aquinas develops sophisticated defenses of these positions, but within theological assumptions that secular approaches cannot adopt.
**Substance Dualism**: Aquinas argues for the soul's subsistent nature partly through its capacity for supernatural operations like direct knowledge and love of God. Without theological context, can philosophical arguments alone establish the kind of substance dualism Sterling's control dichotomy requires?
**Libertarian Free Will**: Thomistic freedom is defended partly through appeal to divine primary causation that enables rather than competes with human secondary causation. Can secular approaches provide equally strong justification for ultimate moral responsibility?
**Ethical Intuitionism**: Natural law theory grounds moral intuition in participation in eternal law established by divine wisdom. Without divine foundations, can practical reason achieve the reliability that Sterling's value judgments require?
**Foundationalism**: The *Summa* integrates rational demonstration with revealed premises that provide additional certainty. Can purely philosophical foundations support the kind of systematic confidence that Sterling's approach claims?
**Correspondence Theory**: Thomistic adequation theory depends on divine truth as exemplar and measure of all finite truth. Can secular correspondence theory provide equal justification for confident claims about moral knowledge?
**Moral Realism**: Natural law derives its objectivity from eternal law established by divine providence. Can naturalistic approaches ground equally strong moral realism without theological assumptions?
### **The Sufficiency Question**
Even if secular philosophy can partially support these commitments, questions remain about whether partial support suffices for Sterling's systematic claims. Aquinas provides comprehensive justification for confident virtue ethics, but through theological integration that may be essential rather than merely supplementary.
The *Summa* suggests that natural virtue achieves genuine but incomplete human flourishing. Complete happiness requires supernatural beatitude that exceeds what philosophical discipline can provide. This raises fundamental questions about Sterling's promise that rational training can guarantee complete freedom from suffering and perfect emotional stability.
If Thomistic analysis is correct, then Sterling's secular approach may succeed in promoting significant character improvement and emotional regulation while falling short of the complete systematic success it promises. Natural virtue is genuinely beneficial but insufficient for ultimate human fulfillment.
### **The Problem of Fallen Nature**
Aquinas' analysis of how sin corrupts human rational and appetitive capacities creates additional complications for secular confidence in systematic virtue development. While unfallen human nature would reliably choose virtue when adequately informed, actual human nature often requires divine assistance for consistent good choice.
This theological anthropology potentially undermines Sterling's optimistic assumptions about what rational training can achieve. If human nature is systematically corrupted in ways that affect both intellectual and volitional capacities, purely philosophical methods may lack the power to deliver reliable character transformation.
However, Aquinas also maintains that significant moral progress remains possible through natural virtue even in fallen conditions. The question becomes whether this natural progress extends far enough to support the kind of systematic results Sterling promises.
### **Cultural and Historical Contingency**
Contemporary scholarship has raised questions about the cultural and historical particularity of Thomistic moral conclusions, challenging claims about universal validity that natural law theory assumes. Many specific moral judgments that Aquinas derives from supposedly universal principles reflect medieval social assumptions rather than timeless rational insights.
This historical criticism potentially undermines the foundationalist confidence that makes Thomistic approaches attractive for systematic virtue ethics. If natural law conclusions are culturally conditioned rather than universally valid, then the systematic certainty that Sterling seeks may be illusory.
Yet defenders of natural law theory argue that historical conditioning affects particular applications rather than fundamental principles, and that careful philosophical analysis can distinguish universal insights from cultural assumptions.
### **The Integration Challenge**
Perhaps the most fundamental challenge concerns whether the philosophical insights that Aquinas develops within theological context can be successfully integrated within secular frameworks without losing their systematic power.
Thomistic virtue ethics achieves its comprehensiveness and confidence through integration of philosophical and theological elements that mutually support and illuminate each other. The removal of theological foundations may not simply weaken the system but fundamentally alter its character in ways that undermine its practical effectiveness.
This suggests that Sterling's attempt to appropriate classical virtue ethics insights while avoiding theological commitments may face inherent limitations. The systematic confidence that makes foundationalist approaches attractive may require metaphysical assumptions that exceed what secular philosophy can justify.
---
## X. ASSESSMENT: STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS FOR STERLING'S SYSTEM
### **Systematic Theoretical Support**
Despite significant complications, Aquinas' *Summa Theologica* provides unparalleled theoretical support for Sterling's six philosophical commitments. No other work in the philosophical tradition offers equally systematic defense of the metaphysical, epistemological, and moral assumptions that Sterling's approach requires.
The sophistication of Thomistic analysis addresses many objections that might be decisive against cruder versions of these positions. Aquinas' careful treatment of mind-body relationships, divine and human causation, the development of moral knowledge, and the integration of universal principles with particular applications provides resources for defending Sterling's commitments against contemporary criticism.
Moreover, the systematic integration of these commitments within Thomistic framework demonstrates their mutual coherence and support in ways that strengthen each individual position. This systematic unity provides cumulative justification that exceeds what any single argument could achieve.
### **Practical Guidance and Character Development**
The *Summa* also provides detailed practical guidance for character development that supports Sterling's therapeutic methodology. Aquinas' analysis of how virtue develops through repeated good choices guided by correct practical reasoning offers systematic justification for confidence in rational training methods.
The Thomistic account of practical wisdom, moral education, and the relationship between intellectual and moral virtue provides sophisticated framework for understanding how Sterling's techniques can achieve systematic results. Natural law theory explains why proper value judgments should produce stable emotional responses and reliable character improvement.
Additionally, Aquinas' recognition of different levels of moral knowledge and their corresponding degrees of certainty suggests flexible approaches to practical guidance that avoid rigid dogmatism while maintaining systematic confidence in fundamental principles.
### **The Theological Dependence Problem**
However, the theological context of Thomistic virtue ethics creates fundamental questions about its applicability to secular approaches like Sterling's system. The divine guarantee that provides systematic confidence for Thomistic conclusions may be essential rather than merely supplementary to the overall framework.
Without theological foundations, Sterling's appropriation of Thomistic insights may lack the systematic certainty that makes foundationalist approaches attractive. Natural reason and natural virtue may achieve significant but incomplete results that fall short of the complete systematic success Sterling promises.
This limitation is particularly significant regarding Sterling's claims about guaranteed emotional freedom and perfect character stability. If these outcomes require supernatural assistance as Thomistic analysis suggests, then purely philosophical methods may be inherently insufficient.
### **The Question of Natural Autonomy**
The crucial question becomes whether Thomistic natural law theory grants sufficient autonomy to philosophical reasoning to support Sterling's secular approach. Aquinas argues that natural reason can discover substantial moral truth and natural virtue can achieve genuine human flourishing independently of revelation.
This partial autonomy suggests that significant appropriation of Thomistic insights may be possible within secular frameworks, even if complete systematic certainty requires theological supplementation. The question is whether partial appropriation can support the systematic confidence that Sterling's approach claims.
Recent scholarship in natural law theory has explored possibilities for developing Thomistic insights within more naturalistic frameworks that avoid supernatural assumptions while maintaining objective moral foundations. These approaches may provide resources for strengthening Sterling's philosophical foundations.
### **Empirical Considerations**
Ultimately, questions about the practical effectiveness of Sterling's approach may require empirical rather than purely theoretical resolution. If systematic virtue training produces the kind of reliable character improvement and emotional stability that Sterling promises, this practical success may provide pragmatic validation for his philosophical assumptions.
Thomistic natural law theory suggests that approaches grounded in correct understanding of human nature should produce predictable results in character development regardless of their theological context. Natural virtue really does promote human flourishing according to the objective structure of rational nature.
The empirical test becomes whether Sterling's secular methods can deliver systematic results comparable to what Thomistic frameworks would predict. Success would suggest that natural law insights can operate effectively within secular contexts, while systematic failure might indicate that theological foundations are essential for reliable virtue ethics.
### **Contemporary Relevance**
Despite its medieval origins, Thomistic virtue ethics addresses contemporary concerns about objective moral knowledge, systematic character development, and the relationship between virtue and happiness in ways that remain philosophically relevant.
The sophisticated integration of metaphysical, epistemological, and practical considerations within Thomistic framework provides resources for contemporary virtue ethics that purely secular approaches may lack. The systematic unity and comprehensive explanatory power of the Thomistic synthesis offer advantages for addressing complex questions about human flourishing.
For Sterling's project, the *Summa Theologica* represents both an ideal and a challenge. It demonstrates the philosophical sophistication that systematic virtue ethics can achieve while raising questions about whether such systematicity is possible without theological assumptions that secular philosophy cannot adopt.
---
## XI. CONCLUSION: THE THOMISTIC FOUNDATION AND ITS LIMITS
### **The Systematic Achievement**
Thomas Aquinas' *Summa Theologica* provides the most comprehensive and sophisticated defense of the six philosophical commitments underlying Sterling's contemporary Stoic system. Through systematic integration of Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology, Aquinas develops unparalleled justification for substance dualism, libertarian free will, ethical intuitionism, foundationalism, correspondence theory of truth, and moral realism.
The systematic unity of these commitments within Thomistic framework demonstrates their mutual coherence and provides cumulative justification that exceeds what any individual argument could achieve. This integration explains why classical virtue ethics traditions could promise systematic results with philosophical confidence—their fundamental assumptions were comprehensively justified within sophisticated metaphysical frameworks.
Moreover, Aquinas' detailed practical guidance for character development through natural law theory and virtue ethics provides systematic justification for Sterling's therapeutic methodology. The Thomistic account of practical wisdom, moral education, and the relationship between correct reasoning and stable character supports confidence in rational training methods.
### **The Theological Challenge**
However, the theological context that enables Thomistic systematicity also creates fundamental challenges for secular appropriation of these insights. The divine guarantee that provides ultimate justification for Aquinas' philosophical conclusions may be essential rather than merely supplementary to the overall framework.
Without theological foundations, Sterling's system may lack the systematic certainty that makes foundationalist approaches attractive while retaining their dogmatic vulnerabilities. Natural reason and natural virtue may achieve significant but incomplete results that fall short of the complete systematic success Sterling promises.
This challenge is particularly acute regarding Sterling's claims about guaranteed emotional freedom and perfect character stability. If Thomistic analysis is correct that complete happiness requires supernatural assistance exceeding what natural virtue can provide, then purely philosophical methods may be inherently limited.
### **The Partial Autonomy Solution**
Yet Thomistic natural law theory's recognition of significant autonomy for philosophical reasoning suggests possibilities for partial appropriation within secular frameworks. Natural reason can discover substantial moral truth and natural virtue can achieve genuine human flourishing independently of revelation, even if complete systematic certainty requires theological supplementation.
This partial autonomy may suffice for practical purposes if Sterling's methods can deliver systematic character improvement and emotional stability through natural virtue development. The empirical success of rational training techniques may provide pragmatic validation for philosophical assumptions even without complete theoretical certainty.
Recent developments in natural law theory have explored possibilities for maintaining Thomistic insights about objective moral truth and systematic character development within more naturalistic frameworks that avoid supernatural assumptions while preserving practical effectiveness.
### **The Historical Significance**
Sterling's project represents a contemporary attempt to recover classical virtue ethics insights for systematic approaches to human flourishing. The *Summa Theologica* reveals both the philosophical sophistication that historical virtue ethics achieved and the comprehensive metaphysical foundations that enabled such systematicity.
This historical perspective illuminates both the promise and the challenge facing contemporary virtue ethics. The traditions that provided strongest theoretical foundations for systematic approaches to character development operated within comprehensive worldviews that integrated philosophical and theological insights in ways that may exceed what secular philosophy can justify.
Yet the philosophical insights developed within these traditions may retain practical value even when detached from their original theological contexts, particularly if empirical validation can substitute for theoretical certainty in justifying confidence in systematic methods.
### **Implications for Contemporary Philosophy**
The Thomistic analysis reveals fundamental tensions in contemporary approaches to virtue ethics and practical philosophy. Systematic confidence in character development and moral knowledge may require metaphysical commitments that secular philosophy cannot provide, while restriction to naturalistic assumptions may undermine the systematic certainty that makes virtue ethics attractive for practical guidance.
This tension suggests the need for more sophisticated integration of theoretical and practical considerations in contemporary virtue ethics. Pure theoretical approaches may lack practical effectiveness, while purely practical approaches may lack systematic justification for their confident claims.
The Thomistic synthesis demonstrates possibilities for comprehensive integration that addresses both theoretical and practical requirements, though within metaphysical frameworks that may not be available to contemporary secular philosophy.
### **The Empirical Test**
Ultimately, questions about the viability of Sterling's secular appropriation of Thomistic insights may require empirical rather than purely theoretical resolution. If systematic virtue training produces reliable character improvement and emotional stability through natural methods, this practical success may provide sufficient justification for philosophical confidence.
Thomistic natural law theory suggests that approaches grounded in correct understanding of human nature should produce predictable results regardless of their theological context, since natural virtue really does promote objective human flourishing according to rational nature's essential structure.
The contemporary test becomes whether Sterling's methods can deliver systematic results comparable to what comprehensive virtue ethics traditions achieved. Success would demonstrate the practical viability of secular appropriation, while systematic failure might indicate that theological foundations are essential for reliable virtue ethics.
### **Final Assessment**
The *Summa Theologica* stands as both the highest achievement and the fundamental challenge for contemporary virtue ethics projects like Sterling's system. It demonstrates the philosophical sophistication that systematic approaches to human flourishing can achieve while revealing the comprehensive metaphysical foundations that such systematicity may require.
For the serious student of Sterling's approach, Aquinas represents essential engagement with the theoretical foundations that make systematic virtue ethics philosophically credible. Whether these foundations can be successfully appropriated within secular frameworks remains an open question that may ultimately require practical rather than purely theoretical resolution.
The enduring significance of Thomistic virtue ethics lies not in its specific theological commitments but in its demonstration that systematic approaches to character development and human flourishing can achieve sophisticated philosophical justification when grounded in comprehensive understanding of human nature and its relationship to ultimate reality.
Whether contemporary philosophy can provide equally comprehensive foundations without theological assumptions remains one of the central challenges facing virtue ethics in the modern world. Sterling's project represents a significant contemporary attempt to meet this challenge, with results that may illuminate both the possibilities and the limitations of secular approaches to systematic human flourishing.
---
## BIBLIOGRAPHY
**Primary Sources:**
- Aquinas, Thomas. *Summa Theologica*. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Brothers, 1947.
- Aquinas, Thomas. *Summa Contra Gentiles*. Translated by Anton C. Pegis. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975.
- Epictetus. *Enchiridion*. Translated by Elizabeth Carter. Various editions.
- Sterling, Grant. Forum posts and lectures on Stoic philosophy.
**Secondary Sources:**
- Finnis, John. *Natural Law and Natural Rights*. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
- Gilson, Étienne. *The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas*. New York: Random House, 1956.
- Lisska, Anthony J. *Aquinas's Theory of Natural Law*. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
- MacIntyre, Alasdair. *After Virtue*. 3rd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.
- Marítain, Jacques. *An Introduction to the Basic Problems of Moral Philosophy*. Albany: Magi Books, 1990.
- McInerny, Ralph. *Ethica Thomistica*. Rev. ed. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1997.
- Pieper, Josef. *The Four Cardinal Virtues*. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966.
- Stump, Eleonore. *Aquinas*. London: Routledge, 2003.
**Note:** This paper represents philosophical analysis of how Thomistic natural law theory provides theoretical foundations for contemporary Stoic practice. It aims to demonstrate logical connections between medieval virtue ethics and contemporary approaches while acknowledging significant tensions between theological and secular frameworks.
