Stoic News

By Dave Kelly

Friday, January 31, 2025

Integrated Analysis of Stoic Framework and 7-Step Model

 

# Integrated Analysis of  Stoic Framework and 7-Step Model


## Core Logical Foundation

The fundamental Stoic proposition can be summarized as: Eudaimonia (human flourishing) is achieved through the combination of virtue and joy, both of which are within our control. This contrasts with externals, which are neither good nor evil and outside our control.

A Representation of Stoicism in Propositional Logic Form


## Integration with 7-Step Model


### Step 1: Recognize the Nature of Impressions

**Logical Basis**: ¬Control(Externals) and Emotion ↔ Belief(Value(Externals))

- Initial impressions are cognitive propositions, not raw sensory data

- They often contain implicit value judgments about externals

- These align with premise 9: emotions arise from beliefs about external values

- Recognition phase implements ¬Control(Externals) by acknowledging our limited control


### Step 2: Apply Dichotomy of Control

**Logical Basis**: Control(Virtue) and Control(Joy)

- Differentiates between what we can and cannot control

- Implements premises 2 and 3: Control(Virtue) and Control(Joy)

- Recognizes that while impressions arise automatically, our response is controllable

- Sets foundation for premise 12: Virtue → ¬Belief(Value(Externals))


### Step 3: Conscious Evaluation

**Logical Basis**: ¬Good(Externals) and ¬Evil(Externals)

- Directly applies premises 7 and 8

- Evaluates impressions against core Stoic principles

- Tests for false value attributions to externals

- Implements premise 10: ¬Value(Externals)


### Step 4: Assent Decision

**Logical Basis**: Emotion ↔ Belief(Value(Externals))

- Implements premise 9 by recognizing how assent leads to emotions

- Connects to premise 11: ¬Emotion ↔ ¬Belief(Value(Externals))

- Creates practical application of premise 13: Joy → ¬Belief(Value(Externals))

- Decision point reflects Control(Virtue) in practice


### Step 5: Formulate Alternative Impressions

**Logical Basis**: Good(Virtue) and Evil(Vice)

- Builds on premises 5 and 6

- Creates new propositions aligned with Stoic values

- Implements premise 14: Eudaimonia ↔ (¬Belief(Value(Externals)) ∧ Virtue)

- Focuses on virtue rather than externals


### Step 6: Focus on Virtuous Action

**Logical Basis**: Eudaimonia ↔ (Virtue ∧ Joy)

- Direct application of premise 1

- Translates theoretical understanding into practical action

- Implements Good(Virtue) through concrete choices

- Avoids Evil(Vice) through conscious action selection


### Step 7: Reinforce Correct Judgments

**Logical Basis**: Virtue → ¬Belief(Value(Externals))

- Completes the cycle by strengthening virtuous patterns

- Reinforces premise 12

- Creates positive feedback loop for character development

- Builds foundation for future impression management


## Character Development Integration


The framework shows how repeated application of the 7-step model leads to character development through:


1. **Progressive Refinement**

   - Each cycle strengthens correct judgments

   - Builds habitual recognition of false value attributions

   - Develops automatic virtue-focused responses


2. **Practical Implementation**

   - Moves from theoretical understanding to practical application

   - Creates concrete decision-making framework

   - Builds consistent pattern of virtuous action


3. **Emotional Management**

   - Systematically reduces emotional reactivity to externals

   - Cultivates joy through virtuous action

   - Develops sustainable emotional equilibrium


4. **Long-term Development**

   - Each cycle reinforces proper understanding

   - Strengthens capacity for correct judgment

   - Builds foundation for continued growth


This integration demonstrates how the logical framework provides the theoretical foundation for practical character development through the 7-step model, while the model offers concrete methods for implementing the philosophical principles in daily life.

7-Step Model of Impression Management

 

This seems to be something that could be useful: 


Claude:

Based on the main source text (see link below), I'll modify and elaborate on this process to more precisely reflect the Stoic understanding of impression management: 


```

Initial Impression Arrives

STEP 1: RECOGNIZE THE NATURE OF IMPRESSIONS

• Understand these are cognitive, propositional claims

• Note they are not raw sensory data but interpreted

• Notice if they contain value judgments

• Acknowledge they are initially outside our control

STEP 2: APPLY DICHOTOMY OF CONTROL

• Recognize impressions initially arise outside our control

• Understand assent is within our control

• Note that formulating new thoughts is in our control

• Remember character development is indirectly in our control

STEP 3: CONSCIOUS EVALUATION

• Hold the impression in mind without immediate assent

• Check if it assigns good/bad values to externals

• Compare against Stoic principles

• Consider duties related to your roles

STEP 4: ASSENT DECISION

• Choose to accept or reject the impression

• If rejected, nothing happens - no emotion/action follows

• If accepted and contains value judgment, desire/emotion follows

• If accepted, may lead to action impressions

STEP 5: FORMULATE ALTERNATIVE IMPRESSIONS

• Create new proposition removing value judgments about externals

• Frame external things as neither good nor evil

• Focus on what is truly in our control

• Consider opportunities for virtue

STEP 6: FOCUS ON VIRTUOUS ACTION

• Formulate action propositions based on:

  - Duties connected to life roles

  - Preferred/dispreferred indifferents

  - Opportunities for virtuous conduct

• Consider what would be truly correct in this situation

STEP 7: REINFORCE CORRECT JUDGMENTS

• When acting correctly, assent to having done good

• Experience appropriate joy from virtuous action

• Allow this to strengthen character over time

• Let this shape future impressions

``` 


Key differences from original:

- More emphasis on cognitive nature of impressions

- Clearer connection between assent and resulting emotions/actions

- Explicit focus on character development through repeated practice

- Recognition that initial impressions are outside direct control

- Greater emphasis on role of duty and virtue in action choices

- More precise understanding of how assent/rejection affects outcomes

- Clear link between current actions and future impression patterns 


This revised version more accurately reflects the text's explanation of how impressions work, the role of assent, and the long-term effects on character development. It captures the Stoic understanding that while initial impressions are not in our control, we can shape them indirectly through consistent practice of proper assent and rejection.

Making correct use of impressions

Tuesday, January 28, 2025

7-STEP PROCESS OF MAKING CORRECT USE OF IMPRESSIONS

 

Making Correct Use of Imptressions 

50 Common Impressions

7-Step Process of Making Correct Use of Impressions


This is the main source. 

Making correct use of impressions, training and character development 

By Grant C. Sterling


"I receive impressions. For the moment, let [us] take

these as being out of our control. Those impressions are

cognitive, propositional--they are not uninterpreted raw data,

but rather ideas that claim that the world is a certain way.

I do not see a collection of colors and patterns--I "see"

my backpack sitting on the chair in front of my desk. Some

of these impressions are value-neutral (as that one is--there

is nothing good or bad about my backpack being on my chair).

But other impressions have a value component. Suppose that I

remember having left my backpack on the floor when I left--

I might now have the impression "my backpack is on my chair,

which means someone has intruded on my office, which is a very

bad thing!"

As I said, for the time being we are assuming that

these impressions are not in our control. But what _is_ in our

control is how we react to them. We can assent, or not assent.

That is, we can accept that a given impression is _true_, or

reject it as unproven or false. (Rejecting it as false involves

both refusing to assent to the impression AND formulating a

new idea (the opposite of the impression) and assenting to

that.) A few minutes ago, I assented to the impression that

my backpack was on the chair. I didn't have to, but I did.

The process of assenting is cognitive (it's something

that happens in the conscious mind), but is very seldom

explicit. By that I mean that, for example, although I assented

to the impression that my backpack was on the chair, at no time

did I formulate the explicit mental thought "It seems to me that

my backpack is on the chair. Should I assent to that impression?

yes, I think I will." My acceptance of the impression was so

simple and momentary that it seems as though things just passed

directly from impression to belief. But that isn't the way it works.

(Imagine a scenario where my backpack being there would be very

unexpected, and you can see how it would be possible for me to

question what my senses seem to be saying. I _could_ question them

even now (and really committed skeptics about the senses might be

able to do this in ordinary cases), I just don't.)

If I refuse to assent to an impression, nothing happens.

No emotion, no action, nothing.

If I assent to an impression with a value component, then

a desire will result. I will desire that the "good" thing happen,

or desire that the "bad" thing not happen. If the impression says

that this outcome has _already_ occurred, then a emotion will result

(in the example above, the likely emotions are anger or fear):

positive feelings of mental enjoyment if the impression was that

something good had happened, negative feelings if it was "bad".

Further, this may lead to another impression, assenting to

which will lead me to some course of action. For example, I might have

the further thought "It would be good for me to go find out who

has been in my office", and if I assent to this further idea then

I will stalk angrily down the hall to demand an explanation. 


All of this sounds complicated, but it boils down to this:

_everything_ on the Stoic view comes down to assent to impressions.

Choosing whether or not to assent to impressions is the only thing

in our control...and yet, everything critical to leading the best

possible life is contained in that one act. All our desires, all

our emotions, all our actions are tied to assenting to impressions.

If I get my assents right, then I have guaranteed eudaimonia. If

I get one wrong, I cannot have eudaimonia. 


One final thing. I said above that we would assume that

the original impressions are not in our control. Directly, that's

true. But indirectly, it isn't, for two reasons: 


a) Our impressions are closely connected to our character.

If you reject an impression, then it makes that same type of

impression less common and weaker. If you assent to it, it becomes

more common and stronger. If it seems to me that it would be good to

punch someone in the nose for insulting me, and I assent, then it

becomes more likely that the next time something annoys me it will

seem to me that I should lash out at someone, and that 'seeming' will

be more compelling. If I refuse to assent, if I tell myself "hitting

them won't solve my problems", then I will have fewer "I should punch

someone" impressions, and they will be weaker (more easily resisted).

So, in this way, by being careful with our acts of assent (which are

in our control), the impressions that we receive will be altered over

time. This is a long process, but is critical for the Stoics--this

is building a virtuous character. The Sage is simply someone who has

controlled their assents so carefully for such a long period of time

that they no longer receive the false value impressions (that externals

are good or bad) in the first place. 


b) While our impressions are not in our control, we do have

the ability (suggested in above examples) to formulate new ideas.

I receive the impression "Someone has been in my office--that's a

very bad thing." If I manage to refuse assent to this impression,

I can choose to formulate an alternative impression--"it seems

that someone has been in my office, but that is neither good nor

bad." This proposition I can correctly assent to. I receive the

impression "I should punch this guy in the nose". If I reject

it, I can formulate some alternative idea. One of my favorite passages

in Epictetus is where he says that if you hear that someone has been

criticizing you, don't try to defend yourself, but instead say

"Obviously he doesn't know my other faults, or he wouldn't have

mentioned these." I wonder how much gossip and how many feuds would

have been prevented if people reacted like that. 


So what we should be striving for is:

a) Don't assent to impressions that depict externals as

either good or evil.

b) If we fail 'a', don't assent to subsequent impressions

that depict immoral responses to the good or bad thing as being

appropriate.

c) Consciously formulate true propositions regarding the

lack of value of external things. As far as possible, do this in

advance. Remind yourself that your own life and health are neither

good nor evil, as are the lives and health of those around you.

The same for your job, etc. Whether or not you have done so in advance,

try to do so at the time. "I have pictures here of your wife having

sex with another man." Remind yourself: 'my wife's actions are not

in my control. They are neither good nor evil. My happiness is in

my control, not enslaved to the actions of others.'

d) Consciously formulate true action propositions. "I

should report truthfully to my boss regarding the sales numbers

from the last quarter: truth telling is virtuous, and I have a

duty to act faithfully at work. If my boss fires me, I should

remember that my job is an external, neither good not evil."

By paying attention to preferred and dispreferred indifferents,

and to the duties connected with my various roles in life, I can

recognize what it would actually be correct for me to do in

each situation. Bring this consciously to mind, and assent to

it.

e) When you do act correctly, assent to the proposition

that you have done a good thing--then you will experience Joy

(or at least proto-Joy.)

f) Over time, my character will change such that I

no longer have the false value impressions in 'a' and 'b',

and 'c' and 'd' and 'e' become routine. This is eudaimonia--

good feelings combined with virtuous actions.



50 COMMON IMPRESSIONS 


1. "This person has wronged me and they must be punished."

   *Initial reaction to perceived injustice, before considering the role of understanding and forgiveness.* 


2. "I need this promotion to be happy."

   *Attaching happiness to external outcomes rather than internal virtue.* 


3. "I can't bear this physical pain."

   *Automatic resistance to discomfort, before accepting it as natural and temporary.* 


4. "Everyone must like and approve of me."

   *Seeking external validation instead of self-approval.* 


5. "I've lost everything that matters."

   *Reaction to loss before recognizing what truly lies within our control.* 


6. "This traffic is ruining my entire day."

   *Allowing external circumstances to dictate our emotional state.* 


7. "My reputation has been damaged forever."

   *Overvaluing others' opinions and external markers of status.* 


8. "I must have certainty about the future."

   *Resisting the natural uncertainty of life.* 


9. "They shouldn't have spoken to me that way."

   *Expecting others to behave according to our preferences.* 


10. "I deserve better than this."

    *Feeling entitled to specific outcomes rather than accepting what is.* 


11. "My past mistakes define who I am."

    *Conflating past actions with present character.* 


12. "This illness is unfair."

    *Resisting natural bodily processes and mortality.* 


13. "I need more possessions to be complete."

    *Attaching happiness to material acquisitions.* 


14. "I can't function without their love."

    *Believing external relationships determine our well-being.* 


15. "This setback means I'm a failure."

    *Conflating temporary circumstances with personal worth.* 


16. "My anger is justified and righteous."

    *Believing emotional reactions must be acted upon.* 


17. "I must control how others perceive me."

    *Attempting to manage the unmanageable.* 


18. "This fear means I shouldn't proceed."

    *Mistaking emotional responses for rational judgments.* 


19. "My success depends on others' actions."

    *Placing responsibility for outcomes on external factors.* 


20. "Life should be easier than this."

    *Resisting the natural challenges of existence.* 


21. "I'm too old/young to start over."

    *Limiting beliefs about time and opportunity.* 


22. "My happiness depends on this relationship."

    *Tying contentment to specific external bonds.* 


23. "This criticism destroys my self-worth."

    *Allowing others' opinions to determine internal value.* 


24. "I can't survive this loss."

    *Overestimating the impact of external changes.* 


25. "My anxiety means something is wrong."

    *Misinterpreting natural emotional responses.* 


26. "I must know everything before acting."

    *Seeking impossible levels of certainty.* 


27. "This person must change for me to be at peace."

    *Placing happiness in others' behavior.* 


28. "My worth is tied to my achievements."

    *Conflating external success with internal value.* 


29. "This physical discomfort is unbearable."

    *Resisting natural bodily experiences.* 


30. "I should have done better in the past."

    *Dwelling on unchangeable previous events.* 


31. "Others have it easier than me."

    *Comparing our struggles to imagined lives of others.* 


32. "This embarrassment will last forever."

    *Overestimating the duration of social discomfort.* 


33. "I need everyone to understand my perspective."

    *Seeking universal agreement or validation.* 


34. "My life should follow my exact plan."

    *Resisting the natural flow of events.* 


35. "This mistake proves I'm incompetent."

    *Generalizing specific events to overall character.* 


36. "I can't handle being alone."

    *Fearing natural states of solitude.* 


37. "My negative thoughts must be true."

    *Believing all mental impressions reflect reality.* 


38. "This change will ruin everything."

    *Resisting natural transitions and evolution.* 


39. "I must maintain perfect control."

    *Seeking impossible levels of influence.* 


40. "Others' success diminishes mine."

    *Viewing life as a zero-sum competition.* 


41. "This grief should be over by now."

    *Imposing timelines on natural emotional processes.* 


42. "I'm too weak to face this challenge."

    *Underestimating internal resilience.* 


43. "My comfort zone is my safety."

    *Avoiding growth opportunities through fear.* 


44. "This rejection defines my worth."

    *Allowing single events to determine self-value.* 


45. "I must never appear vulnerable."

    *Resisting natural human experiences.* 


46. "My emotions must be controlled perfectly."

    *Seeking impossible emotional regulation.* 


47. "This obstacle means I should quit."

    *Interpreting challenges as stop signs.* 


48. "I need constant excitement to be fulfilled."

    *Seeking external stimulation for contentment.* 


49. "My differences make me unworthy."

    *Viewing unique traits as flaws.* 


50. "This moment must be different than it is."

    *Resisting the present reality.*



7-STEP PROCESS OF MAKING CORRECT USE OF IMPRESSIONS 


Initial Impression Arrives

STEP 1: RECOGNIZE THE NATURE OF IMPRESSIONS

• Understand these are cognitive, propositional claims

• Note they are not raw sensory data but interpreted

• Notice if they contain value judgments

• Acknowledge they are initially outside our control

STEP 2: APPLY DICHOTOMY OF CONTROL

• Recognize impressions initially arise outside our control

• Understand assent is within our control

• Note that formulating new thoughts is in our control

• Remember character development is indirectly in our control

STEP 3: CONSCIOUS EVALUATION

• Hold the impression in mind without immediate assent

• Check if it assigns good/bad values to externals

• Compare against Stoic principles

• Consider duties related to your roles

STEP 4: ASSENT DECISION

• Choose to accept or reject the impression

• If rejected, nothing happens - no emotion/action follows

• If accepted and contains value judgment, desire/emotion follows

• If accepted, may lead to action impressions

STEP 5: FORMULATE ALTERNATIVE IMPRESSIONS

• Create new proposition removing value judgments about externals

• Frame external things as neither good nor evil

• Focus on what is truly in our control

• Consider opportunities for virtue

STEP 6: FOCUS ON VIRTUOUS ACTION

• Formulate action propositions based on:

  - Duties connected to life roles

  - Preferred/dispreferred indifferents

  - Opportunities for virtuous conduct

• Consider what would be truly correct in this situation

STEP 7: REINFORCE CORRECT JUDGMENTS

• When acting correctly, assent to having done good

• Experience appropriate joy from virtuous action

• Allow this to strengthen character over time

• Let this shape future impressions

``` 


Key differences from original:

- More emphasis on cognitive nature of impressions

- Clearer connection between assent and resulting emotions/actions

- Explicit focus on character development through repeated practice

- Recognition that initial impressions are outside direct control

- Greater emphasis on role of duty and virtue in action choices

- More precise understanding of how assent/rejection affects outcomes

- Clear link between current actions and future impression patterns 


This revised version more accurately reflects the text's explanation of how impressions work, the role of assent, and the long-term effects on character development. It captures the Stoic understanding that while initial impressions are not in our control, we can shape them indirectly through consistent practice of proper assent and rejection.



Thursday, January 09, 2025

The Discipline of Desire in the First Five Chapters of the Enchiridion


 An analysis by Claude of how the first five chapters of the Enchiridion support the following argument (informing the discipline of desire) made by Grant C. Sterling: 


Section One: Preliminaries ["Core Stoicism"]

Th 1) Everyone wants happiness.

Th 2) If you want happiness, it would be irrational

to accept incomplete or imperfect happiness

if you could get complete [continual, uninterrupted]

happiness.

2*) Complete happiness is possible. [To be proven

below.] 


Section Two: Negative Happiness

Th 3) All human unhappiness is caused by having

a desire or emotional commitment [I will henceforth

say "desire" for simplicity] to some outcome,

and then that outcome does not result. 


4) Ergo, if you desire something which is out

of your control, you will be subject to possible

unhappiness. If you desire many things out

of your control, the possibility of complete happiness

approaches zero.

5) By 4, 2*, and Th2, desiring things out of your

control is irrational [if it is possible to control your

desires]. 


Th 6) The only things in our control are our

beliefs and will, and anything entailed by our

beliefs and will.

Th 7) Desire[s] are caused by beliefs (judgments)

about good and evil. [You desire what you judge

to be good, and desire to avoid what you judge to

be evil.]

8) Ergo, Desires are in our control.

9) By 5 and 8, desiring things out of our control

is irrational. 


Th 10) The only thing actually good is virtue, the

only thing actually evil is vice.

11) Ergo, since virtue and vice are types of acts

of will, they are in our control. 


12) Ergo, things that are not in our control [externals] are

never good or evil.


13) [cf 9, above] Desiring things out of our control is

irrational, since it involves false judgment. 


14) Ergo, if we value only virtue, we will both judge truly

and be immune to all unhappiness. 


Epictetus' Enchiridion, Chapters 1--5


Let me analyze how the Enchiridion's first five chapters support this (above) logical argument. I'll break this down systematically: 


1. Support for Thesis 3 (All unhappiness comes from unfulfilled desires):

- Chapter 2 directly states this: "he who fails in his desire is unfortunate, while he who falls into what he would avoid experiences misfortune"

- Chapter 5 reinforces this by stating that our judgments, not things themselves, cause disturbance 


2. Support for Thesis 6 (Only beliefs and will are in our control):

- Chapter 1 explicitly lists what is and isn't under our control: "Under our control are conception, choice, desire, aversion, and, in a word, everything that is our own doing"

- It contrasts this with things not under our control: "body, property, reputation, office" 


3. Support for Thesis 7 (Desires are caused by beliefs/judgments):

- Chapter 5 provides the clearest support: "It is not the things themselves that disturb men, but their judgements about these things"

- The death example in Chapter 5 shows how judgment (not the thing itself) creates the emotional response 


4. Support for Points 8-9 (Desires are controllable and desiring externals is irrational):

- Chapter 2 instructs us to "remove utterly your desire" for things not under our control

- Chapter 1 states that trying to control externals leads to being "hampered" and in "turmoil" 


5. Support for Points 12-14 (Externals aren't good/evil; true judgment leads to happiness):

- Chapter 3's jug example shows how emotional attachment to externals leads to disturbance

- Chapter 4's bathing example demonstrates how maintaining proper judgment ("moral purpose in harmony with nature") prevents disturbance

- The entire thrust of Chapter 1 shows that treating externals as our own leads to suffering, while limiting ourselves to what's truly ours leads to freedom from compulsion and harm 


The key linkage between the Enchiridion and the argument is that both share the fundamental premise that unhappiness comes from misaligned desires and incorrect judgments about what is good/evil, controllable/uncontrollable. The Enchiridion provides practical examples and exercises that support the logical steps of the argument, particularly in showing how judgment creates desire, how desire for externals leads to suffering, and how correct understanding of what's in our control leads to tranquility. 


The Enchiridion's emphasis on practical application (like the examples in Chapters 3 and 4) helps bridge the gap between the argument's theoretical framework and its practical conclusion about achieving happiness through proper judgment and desire. 


Would you like me to elaborate on any particular connection between the texts?

Wednesday, January 08, 2025

A plumber's role duties and associated indifferents


 Claude:

Let me analyze this step by step. 


A plumber's role duties and associated indifferents can be derived from applying the Stoic framework to their professional function and social relationships. 


Role Duties of a Plumber:

1. Technical competence

   - Maintain up-to-date knowledge of plumbing systems and codes

   - Execute repairs and installations correctly

   - Diagnose problems accurately 


2. Professional integrity

   - Provide honest assessments of problems

   - Charge fair prices for work

   - Complete work within promised timeframes

   - Follow safety regulations and building codes 


3. Client relationships

   - Communicate clearly about problems and solutions

   - Respect client property

   - Provide accurate estimates

   - Respond promptly to emergency calls according to service agreements 


Preferred Indifferents:

- Client satisfaction (aim for but don't attach to it)

- Successful completion of repairs

- Good working conditions

- Adequate tools and materials

- Physical health to perform work

- Professional reputation

- Sufficient income 


Dispreferred Indifferents:

- Difficult working conditions

- Challenging client interactions

- Complex or dangerous repairs

- Weather conditions affecting work

- Competition from other plumbers

- Equipment failures

- Physical strain 


The Stoic plumber would:

- Focus on executing their duties with excellence regardless of conditions

- Aim at preferred indifferents while remaining detached from outcomes

- Maintain proper relations with clients regardless of their behavior

- Remember that while income and reputation are preferred, they are ultimately externals

- Find satisfaction in virtuous action rather than external success 


Does this analysis help clarify how Stoic principles apply to this specific profession?


Preferred/Dispreferred Indifferents and Role Duties

Preferred/Dispreferred Indifferents and Role Duties

Texts



# "Core Stoicism" 


## Section Two: Negative Happiness 


13) [cf 9, above] Desiring things out of our control is

irrational, since it involves false judgment. 


14) Ergo, if we value only virtue, we will both judge truly

and be immune to all unhappiness.



## "Section Three: Positive Happiness or Appropriate

Positive Feelings" 


"15) Ergo, if we truly judge that virtue is good, we will

desire it.

Th 16) If you desire something, and achieve it, you

will get a positive feeling.

17) Ergo, if we correctly judge and correctly will, we

will have appropriate positive feelings as a result.





##"Section Four: Virtue 


Th 24) In order to perform an act of will, the act of will

must have some content. The content is composed

of the result at which one aims.

Th 25) Some things are appropriate objects at which to

aim, although they are not genuinely good.

Th 26) Some such objects are things like life [our own or others'], health, pleasure, knowledge, justice, truth-telling, etc.

Th 27) Virtue consists of rational acts of will, vice of

irrational acts of will.

28) Ergo, any act that aims at an [external] object of desire is

not virtuous, since all desires [for externals] are irrational.

29) Ergo, virtue consists of the pursuit of appropriate

objects of aim, not the pursuit of the [external] objects of our

desires. Such virtuous acts will give us good feelings

[by 17], and since we have no desires regarding

the actual outcome, they will never produce unhappiness

for us." 


Core Stoicism 


The "appropriate objects at which to aim" are preferred indifferents.



# Enchiridion 


## 30. Our duties are in general measured by our social relationships. He is a father. One is called upon to take care of him, to give way to him in all things, to submit when he reviles or strikes you. "But he is a bad father." Did nature, then, bring you into relationship with a good father? No, but simply with a father. "My brother does me wrong." Very well, then, maintain the relation that you have toward him; and do not consider what he is doing, but what you will have to do, if your moral purpose is to be in harmony with nature. For no one will harm you without your consent; you will have been harmed only when you think you are harmed. In this way, therefore, you will discover what duty to expect of your neighbour, your citizen, your commanding officer, if you acquire the habit of looking at your social relations with them.




# "Making correct use of impressions" 


## "So what we should be striving for is:" 


### "d) Consciously formulate true action propositions. "I⁰

should report truthfully to my boss regarding the sales numbers

from the last quarter: truth telling is virtuous, and I have a

duty to act faithfully at work. If my boss fires me, I should

remember that my job is an external, neither good not evil."

By paying attention to preferred and dispreferred indifferents,

and to the duties connected with my various roles in life, I can

recognize what it would actually be correct for me to do in

each situation. Bring this consciously to mind, and assent to

it" 


Making Correct Use Of Impressions




Claude:

Let me analyze the connections between these texts regarding preferred/dispreferred indifferents and role duties.



# Analysis of Preferred Indifferents and Role Duties in Stoic Texts 


## Key Conceptual Connections 


### The Nature of Preferred Indifferents 


1. In "Core Stoicism," preferred indifferents are introduced as "appropriate objects at which to aim" (Th 25). These include:

   - Life (our own or others')

   - Health

   - Pleasure

   - Knowledge

   - Justice

   - Truth-telling 


2. These objects have a unique status:

   - They are not "genuinely good" (Th 25)

   - They are appropriate to aim at (Th 25-26)

   - They must not become objects of desire, as desires for externals are considered irrational (Th 28) 


### Role Duties and Social Relationships 


1. The Enchiridion establishes that:

   - Duties are measured by social relationships

   - These duties exist independently of the other person's behavior

   - The focus should be on maintaining one's own proper relation to others

   - Natural relationships (like father-child) create obligations regardless of the other's merit 


2. The synthesis text ("So what we should be striving for") demonstrates how these concepts work together:

   - Truth-telling is identified as both a preferred indifferent and a role duty

   - Job performance is tied to role duties ("duty to act faithfully at work")

   - The job itself is properly classified as an external indifferent 


### Integration of Concepts 


The texts together reveal a sophisticated ethical framework where: 


1. Role duties provide concrete guidance for action while preferred indifferents provide the appropriate objects of aim 


2. Both systems work together to guide behavior while maintaining emotional independence:

   - We aim at preferred indifferents without becoming attached to outcomes

   - We fulfill role duties regardless of others' behavior

   - We maintain proper relations while remembering externals are neither good nor evil 


3. This creates a practical decision-making framework

   - Identify relevant role duties

   - Select appropriate aims from preferred indifferents

   - Act accordingly while maintaining detachment from outcomes 


## Practical Application 


The framework resolves potential conflicts by: 


1. Distinguishing between:

   - The duty to act (which we control)

   - The outcome (which we don't control) 


2. Providing clear priorities:

   - Role duties tell us what to do

   - Preferred indifferents tell us what to aim at

   - Virtue consists in proper willing toward these objects

   - External outcomes remain indifferent 


This creates a coherent system for ethical decision-making that maintains both practical effectiveness and emotional independence.



This analysis shows how these texts work together to create a practical ethical framework. Would you like me to elaborate on any particular aspect of these connections?


A plumber's role duties and associated indifferents