MIND MAP OF MAKING CORRECT USE OF IMPRESSIONS
MAKING CORRECT USE OF IMPRESSIONS
│
├─ 1. RECEPTION (IMPRESSION)
│ │
│ ├─ Triple-Action
│ │ │
│ │ ├─ Appears
│ │ │ ├─ Enters consciousness as event
│ │ │ ├─ Already formatted as proposition
│ │ │ └─ Already interpreted
│ │ │
│ │ ├─ Asserts
│ │ │ ├─ Claims what is the case
│ │ │ ├─ Speaks with certainty
│ │ │ └─ Carries grammatical force of fact
│ │ │
│ │ ├─ Demands
│ │ │ ├─ Pulls toward assent
│ │ │ ├─ Solicits belief
│ │ │ └─ Seeks immediate reaction
│ │ │
│ │ └─ Juridical-Structure
│ │ └─ Impression = plaintiff
│ │
│ ├─ Correspondence-Already-Operating
│ │ ├─ Arrives pre-packaged with truth-claim
│ │ ├─ Claims to match objective reality
│ │ └─ Truth-apt from moment of arrival
│ │
│ ├─ Moral-Realism-at-Perceptual-Level
│ │ ├─ Reports moral properties of events
│ │ ├─ Claims to detect real good and evil
│ │ └─ Not reporting feelings but objective facts
│ │
│ ├─ Pretense-of-Authority
│ │ ├─ Arrives wearing judicial robes
│ │ ├─ Seems true, important, actionable
│ │ └─ Assumes rather than requests belief
│ │
│ └─ Taxonomy-of-Error
│ ├─ False-Fact
│ ├─ False-Value
│ └─ Mixed-Error
│
├─ 2. RECOGNITION
│ │
│ ├─ The-Separation
│ │ ├─ External-event (world)
│ │ ├─ Impression (representation)
│ │ └─ Prohairesis (rational faculty)
│ │
│ ├─ Ontological-Operation
│ │ ├─ Restores subject-object structure
│ │ ├─ Self reclaims position as observer
│ │ └─ Not psychological but metaphysical
│ │
│ ├─ Dualist-Foundation
│ │ ├─ Mind not identical with representations
│ │ ├─ Representations not identical with world
│ │ └─ Prohairesis is distinct locus of judgment
│ │
│ ├─ Status-Change
│ │ ├─ "This is so" becomes "This claims to be so"
│ │ ├─ Reality becomes representation
│ │ └─ Correspondence becomes applicable
│ │
│ └─ Space-Created
│ ├─ Between appearance and assent
│ ├─ Between representation and belief
│ └─ Condition for freedom
│
├─ 3. PAUSE
│ │
│ ├─ Nature-of-Pause
│ │ ├─ Act of jurisdiction
│ │ ├─ Not a breathing exercise
│ │ └─ Prohairesis asserting authority
│ │
│ ├─ Three-Operations
│ │ ├─ Suspends assumed authority
│ │ ├─ Separates factual from evaluative claims
│ │ └─ Tests both against reality
│ │
│ ├─ Chain-Interrupted
│ │ ├─ Impression to assent (blocked)
│ │ ├─ Assent to false-judgment (blocked)
│ │ └─ False-judgment to desire to unhappiness (blocked)
│ │
│ └─ Demonstration
│ ├─ Proves assent is in our control
│ ├─ Makes Th.6 concrete
│ └─ Opens space for examination
│
├─ 4. EXAMINATION
│ │
│ ├─ The-Test
│ │ ├─ Foundation-test (Th.10-12 axioms)
│ │ ├─ Classification-test (virtue/vice/indifferent)
│ │ └─ Correspondence-test (matches reality?)
│ │
│ ├─ Key-Distinction
│ │ ├─ Appropriate-preference (allowed)
│ │ └─ False-value-judgment (rejected)
│ │
│ ├─ Realist-Constraint
│ │ ├─ Fact of the matter exists
│ │ ├─ Truth not negotiable
│ │ └─ No harmonizing, only testing
│ │
│ └─ Possible-Results
│ ├─ True (impression stands)
│ ├─ False (impression fails)
│ └─ Undetermined (suspension follows)
│
└─ 5. DECISION
│
├─ Nature-of-Act
│ ├─ Terminates examination
│ ├─ Converts possibility to actuality
│ └─ Freedom becomes deed
│
├─ Three-Options
│ ├─ Assent
│ ├─ Refusal
│ └─ Suspension
│
├─ Constraint-of-Truth
│ ├─ Governed by correspondence
│ ├─ Not pragmatic or emotional
│ └─ Alignment of will with what is
│
├─ Entry-of-Responsibility
│ ├─ Agent could have chosen otherwise
│ ├─ Agent knew what was true
│ └─ Agent was not compelled
│
└─ Outcomes
├─ Assent to truth → virtue
├─ Assent to falsehood → error
└─ Suspension → inquiry continues
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home