The Platonic Foundation of Sterling's Reformed Stoicism

The Platonic Foundation of Sterling's Reformed Stoicism: How the Republic's Six Philosophical Commitments Enable Systematic Moral Philosophy

Abstract

Grant C. Sterling's reformed Stoicism demonstrates remarkable philosophical coherence through its adoption of six meta-philosophical commitments that find their archetypal expression in Plato's Republic. This paper examines how substance dualism, libertarian free will, ethical intuitionism, foundationalism, correspondence theory of truth, and moral realism function as an integrated philosophical framework in both Plato's and Sterling's systems. By decoupling Stoic ethics from classical Stoic physics while maintaining rigorous logical structure, Sterling creates a universal moral framework grounded in the same systematic foundations that Plato established in the Republic. The analysis demonstrates that Sterling's approach achieves both theoretical rigor and practical applicability by inheriting Plato's proven method of unifying metaphysical, epistemological, and ethical commitments into a coherent whole.

I. Introduction

Contemporary philosophy often struggles with fragmentation - ethical theories disconnected from metaphysical foundations, epistemological skepticism undermining moral knowledge, and practical wisdom divorced from systematic theory. Grant C. Sterling's reformed Stoicism presents a notable exception: a moral philosophy that achieves both rigorous logical consistency and practical applicability through its adoption of six fundamental philosophical commitments. These commitments - substance dualism, libertarian free will, ethical intuitionism, foundationalism, correspondence theory of truth, and moral realism - find their most complete and systematic expression in Plato's Republic.

This paper argues that Sterling's philosophical framework gains its coherence and power through its alignment with the integrated systematic approach that Plato pioneered in the Republic. Rather than representing philosophical innovation, Sterling's six commitments place him within the classical tradition of systematic moral philosophy that Plato established. The Republic demonstrates how these six commitments work together as a unified framework, each supporting and requiring the others in a logically necessary structure that has proven remarkably durable across 2,400 years of philosophical development.

The significance of this alignment extends beyond historical interest. Sterling's success in creating a practically applicable moral philosophy through systematic rational analysis suggests that the Platonic approach to philosophical integration remains viable for contemporary moral philosophy. By examining how the Republic's framework enables Sterling's reformed Stoicism, we can better understand both the strengths and limitations of systematic approaches to moral philosophy in an era often characterized by philosophical skepticism and fragmentation.

Sterling's Six Philosophical Commitments

Sterling's reformed Stoicism rests on six meta-philosophical commitments that provide the systematic foundation for his ethical framework. These commitments operate not as isolated philosophical positions but as interconnected elements of a unified worldview.

**Substance Dualism** maintains that mind or soul constitutes a distinct metaphysical category from physical matter. For Sterling, this dualism enables the sharp distinction between what is "up to us" (our rational faculties, judgments, and choices) and what is "not up to us" (external circumstances, other people's actions, and physical events). Without this metaphysical distinction, the Stoic control dichotomy loses its foundation, reducing to mere practical advice rather than systematic philosophy.

**Libertarian Free Will** establishes genuine choice and ultimate moral responsibility. Sterling's system requires that agents possess real alternatives in their moral decisions and bear ultimate responsibility for their choices. This commitment distinguishes his approach from deterministic interpretations of Stoicism that would make moral responsibility ultimately illusory. The libertarian position enables Sterling to maintain that virtue and vice represent genuine achievements or failures rather than inevitable outcomes of causal chains.

**Ethical Intuitionism** asserts that moral truths are directly accessible to rational insight rather than derived from empirical observation, cultural convention, or arbitrary preference. Sterling's confidence in the rational demonstrability of Stoic principles presupposes that properly functioning reason can achieve certain knowledge of moral reality. This commitment provides the epistemological foundation for his systematic approach to moral philosophy.

**Foundationalism** holds that knowledge builds systematically from certain first principles that are self-evident to rational reflection. Sterling's systematic presentation of Stoic doctrine - moving from basic categorical distinctions through logical implications to practical applications - exemplifies foundationalist methodology. His approach assumes that moral philosophy can achieve the systematic rigor of mathematical demonstration.

**Correspondence Theory of Truth** maintains that true statements correspond to objective features of reality rather than representing useful fictions, social constructions, or pragmatic tools. Sterling's moral claims presuppose that statements about virtue, vice, and human flourishing can be objectively true or false based on their correspondence to moral reality.

**Moral Realism** asserts that moral properties exist objectively in reality rather than being projected by human attitudes, preferences, or cultural practices. Sterling's system requires that virtue is genuinely good and vice genuinely bad in ways that transcend individual or cultural opinion. This commitment provides the metaphysical foundation for his categorical moral distinction.

II. The Republic's Systematic Framework

Plato's Republic provides the archetypal demonstration of how these six commitments function as an integrated philosophical system. Rather than defending each commitment independently, Plato shows how they logically require and support each other in a unified framework for understanding reality, knowledge, and morality.

The Metaphysical Foundation: Substance Dualism

The Republic establishes substance dualism through the tripartite soul theory (Books IV, IX, X) and the immortality arguments (Book X). In passages 435b-441c, Plato argues that the soul consists of three distinct parts - reason (*logistikon*), spirit (*thymoeides*), and appetite (*epithymetikon*) - with reason naturally ruling over the others. The famous image of the soul as a composite creature (588b-592b) depicts reason as the human form controlling the lion (spirit) and many-headed beast (appetite), establishing clear hierarchical dualism.

The immortality arguments (608d-611a) demonstrate that the soul belongs to a fundamentally different ontological category than the body. Unlike physical matter, which is subject to dissolution and destruction, the soul is indivisible and eternal because it participates in the realm of Being rather than Becoming. This metaphysical distinction provides the foundation for the soul's capacity to transcend material causation and achieve genuine knowledge and moral agency.

Libertarian Agency and Moral Responsibility

The Republic's treatment of free will appears most clearly in the Myth of Er (617d-620d), where souls choose their next lives from available patterns. The explicit statement that "responsibility lies with the chooser; God is blameless" (*aitia helomenou; theos anaitios*) establishes ultimate moral responsibility while rejecting deterministic excuses for moral failure.

The Cave allegory (514a-521b) reinforces this commitment by emphasizing that the philosopher's conversion requires voluntary effort. The prisoner must actively choose to turn toward the light despite the pain and difficulty involved. Knowledge isn't passively received but actively pursued through free rational choice, establishing the connection between libertarian agency and moral development.

The Platonic Foundation of Sterling's Reformed Stoicism

Plato's most distinctive contribution to ethical intuitionism appears in his treatment of the Form of the Good (508e-509b). The Good exists "beyond being in dignity and power" (*epekeina tes ousias presbeia kai dynamei*) yet remains directly apprehensible by the rational soul. This paradoxical combination - transcendent reality accessible to human reason - provides the foundation for objective moral knowledge.

The dialectical method described in Books VI-VII shows how rational reflection can achieve direct insight into first principles. Unlike empirical knowledge, which depends on sensory mediation, moral knowledge involves pure intellectual apprehension (*noesis*) of eternal truths. The philosopher-king's authority derives from this rational vision of the Good rather than from conventional political arrangements.

Systematic Knowledge: Foundationalism

The Republic's foundationalist methodology appears most clearly in the Divided Line (509d-511e), which establishes a systematic hierarchy of knowledge from images through physical objects to mathematical objects to Forms. Each level provides more certain foundations than the level below, culminating in "unhypothetical first principles" (*anhypothetos arche*) that serve as the ultimate foundation for all knowledge.

The dialectical method demonstrates how systematic reasoning can move from hypothetical assumptions to unhypothetical starting points. Mathematical reasoning provides the model: geometers use diagrams and assumptions as stepping stones to reach pure rational insights that no longer depend on sensory aids or unproven premises.

Truth as Correspondence to Reality

Plato's correspondence theory emerges clearly in his analysis of knowledge, opinion, and ignorance (477a-478d). Knowledge (*episteme*) relates to what fully is (*to on*), opinion (*doxa*) to what both is and is not, and ignorance to what is not. Truth consists in the mind's correspondence to degrees of reality rather than in coherence, pragmatic utility, or social consensus.

The sun analogy (508d-e) reinforces this correspondence model: just as the sun makes objects visible and sight possible, the Good makes Forms knowable and knowledge possible. Truth emerges from the correspondence between illuminated intellect and illuminated reality, establishing an objective standard that transcends subjective perspective.

Objective Moral Reality: Moral Realism

The Republic's moral realism appears most systematically in the definition of justice as "each part doing its own work" (*to ta hautou prattein*). This principle applies across multiple levels - individual soul, political state, and cosmic order - because all participate in the same objective Form of Justice. Moral properties represent structural features of reality rather than human conventions or preferences.

The critique of relativism in Book I, particularly the refutation of Thrasymachus's claim that justice is "the advantage of the stronger," demonstrates Plato's commitment to objective moral truth. The systematic analysis of declining constitutions in Books VIII-IX shows that justice and injustice have measurable effects on human flourishing because they align with or violate objective features of human nature and cosmic order.

IV. The Integrated System: How the Commitments Work Together

The Republic's most significant contribution lies not in defending individual philosophical positions but in demonstrating how the six commitments form a logically integrated system where each element requires and supports the others.

Substance Dualism as Enabling Foundation

Substance dualism provides the metaphysical foundation that makes the other five commitments possible. Only if reason belongs to a different ontological category than physical matter can it:

- Operate according to rational principles rather than mechanical causation (enabling free will)

- Apprehend incorporeal Forms through pure thought (enabling moral knowledge)

- Achieve correspondence with eternal rather than temporal reality (enabling objective truth)

- Discover universal principles that transcend particular circumstances (enabling foundationalism)

- Access objective moral reality independent of physical circumstances (enabling moral realism)

The tripartite soul theory demonstrates this enabling function by showing how reason's metaphysical distinctness from appetite allows it to evaluate desires according to rational standards rather than being determined by them.

III. The Republic's Systematic Framework

Free Will and Moral Realism as Mutually Supporting

Libertarian free will and moral realism require each other logically. The Myth of Er illustrates this mutual dependence: the statement "responsibility lies with the chooser" presupposes both genuine choice (libertarian agency) and objective moral standards (moral realism). Without free will, moral responsibility becomes meaningless; without moral realism, free choices lack objective moral significance.

The philosopher's choice to return to the cave demonstrates this integration practically. The choice is genuinely free (the philosopher could remain in contemplation) and objectively correct (serving the Good requires helping others), showing how libertarian agency and moral truth unite in concrete decision-making.

Ethical Intuitionism as Epistemological Bridge

Ethical intuitionism bridges the gap between metaphysical commitments (dualism, moral realism) and epistemological commitments (foundationalism, correspondence theory). Only if the rational soul can directly apprehend moral reality can moral knowledge achieve the certainty and systematic character that foundationalism requires.

The Form of the Good serves this bridging function by being simultaneously:

- Metaphysically real (supporting moral realism)

- Rationally accessible (supporting intuitionism)

- Foundational for all knowledge (supporting foundationalism)

- The source of truth (supporting correspondence theory)

Foundationalism as Systematic Organization

Foundationalism provides the methodological framework that organizes all other commitments into a coherent system. The systematic progression from images to Forms shows how:

- Different levels of reality (supporting dualism)

- Require different cognitive capacities (supporting the distinction between rational and sensory knowledge)

- Enable different degrees of truth (supporting correspondence theory)

- Build toward ultimate foundations (supporting the accessibility of first principles)

- Provide objective standards for evaluation (supporting moral realism)

Correspondence Theory as Validation Mechanism

The correspondence theory validates the entire systematic enterprise by providing objective standards for distinguishing truth from error. Without correspondence to reality, the system would collapse into subjective preference or cultural convention.

The Divided Line demonstrates this validation function by showing how each level of knowledge corresponds to a level of reality, ensuring that systematic rational progress represents genuine advancement toward truth rather than mere conceptual elaboration.

Moral Realism as Practical Completion

Moral realism completes the system by providing objective content for moral decision-making. The definition of justice as structural harmony demonstrates how objective moral principles can guide practical choices while being grounded in eternal truth.

The philosopher-king ideal shows this completion function: philosophical insight into objective moral reality (through all six commitments working together) enables practical political leadership that serves genuine human flourishing rather than arbitrary preference or conventional arrangement.

V. Sterling's Inheritance and Innovation

8

Sterling's reformed Stoicism demonstrates remarkable philosophical sophistication through its conscious adoption of the same integrated framework that Plato pioneered in the Republic. However, Sterling's approach involves both inheritance and innovation in adapting this classical framework to contemporary moral philosophy.

Objective Moral Reality: Moral Realism

Sterling inherits from Plato the confidence that systematic rational analysis can achieve certain knowledge of moral truth. His foundationalist methodology - moving from basic categorical distinctions through logical implications to practical applications - mirrors Plato's systematic approach in the Republic. Both philosophers assume that moral philosophy can achieve the rigor and certainty of mathematical demonstration when properly grounded in self-evident first principles.

The control dichotomy that forms the foundation of Sterling's system reflects Platonic substance dualism. Sterling's sharp distinction between what is "up to us" (rational faculties, judgments, choices) and "not up to us" (external circumstances, other people's actions) depends on the metaphysical distinction between rational soul and material world that Plato established.

Sterling's confidence in the rational demonstrability of Stoic principles presupposes Platonic ethical intuitionism. His systematic presentation assumes that properly functioning reason can achieve direct insight into moral truth, enabling the categorical distinctions (good/bad/indifferent) that structure his entire system.

Strategic Innovation

Sterling's most significant innovation lies in his strategic decoupling of Stoic ethics from classical Stoic physics and cosmology. While maintaining the systematic rigor that the six commitments enable, Sterling argues that Stoic ethical insights can stand independently of commitments to materialist metaphysics, cosmic determinism, or cyclical conflagration.

This decoupling strategy serves multiple purposes. First, it makes Stoic ethics compatible with various metaphysical frameworks - theistic, atheistic, agnostic - while maintaining logical rigor. Second, it addresses contemporary skepticism about ancient cosmological claims without abandoning the systematic approach to moral philosophy. Third, it demonstrates that ethical insights can achieve universal applicability when properly grounded in rational principles rather than contingent empirical claims.

Sterling's treatment of providence illustrates this strategic approach. He includes providential considerations in his systematic presentation because they contribute to human flourishing, but makes them optional rather than logically necessary. This modularity allows individuals with different metaphysical commitments to adopt the same ethical framework while gaining additional benefits if their worldview includes providential elements.

Logical Consistency as Validation

Sterling's systematic approach achieves remarkable logical consistency, as demonstrated by the successful translation of his natural language philosophy into formal propositional logic. The fourteen foundational propositions that can be extracted from his work show how complex philosophical positions emerge from simple categorical judgments and logical operations, validating the foundationalist methodology he inherits from Plato.

This logical consistency provides empirical evidence for the viability of the six-commitment framework in contemporary moral philosophy. Sterling's success in creating a practically applicable moral philosophy through systematic rational analysis suggests that the Platonic approach to philosophical integration remains viable despite contemporary philosophical fragmentation.

VI. Contemporary Significance and Limitations

Sterling's successful adaptation of Platonic systematic methodology has significant implications for contemporary moral philosophy, while also revealing certain limitations of the six-commitment framework.

Strengths of the Systematic Approach

The integration of metaphysical, epistemological, and ethical commitments provides several advantages over fragmented approaches to moral philosophy. First, systematic integration enables coherent practical guidance by grounding ethical recommendations in comprehensive understanding of human nature and reality. Second, foundationalist methodology allows for rigorous testing of moral claims through logical derivation from first principles. Third, the framework provides stability and universality by anchoring moral insights in objective truth rather than changing cultural preferences.

Sterling's system demonstrates these advantages practically. His approach provides clear guidance for moral decision-making (through the control dichotomy), enables systematic moral education (through rational demonstration of ethical principles), and offers psychological stability (through alignment with objective moral reality). The remarkable logical consistency of his framework suggests that systematic approaches can achieve both theoretical rigor and practical applicability.

Philosophical Limitations and Challenges

However, the six-commitment framework also faces significant philosophical challenges that limit its contemporary appeal. The framework requires acceptance of controversial metaphysical commitments - particularly substance dualism and libertarian free will - that many contemporary philosophers reject based on empirical and theoretical considerations.

Substance dualism faces challenges from neuroscience and cognitive psychology, which increasingly explain mental phenomena through physical processes. Contemporary philosophy of mind tends toward physicalist approaches that would undermine the sharp mind-body distinction on which both Plato's and Sterling's systems depend.

Libertarian free will faces challenges from deterministic understandings of human behavior supported by psychology, neuroscience, and social science. Many contemporary philosophers argue that moral responsibility can be preserved through compatibilist approaches that don't require ultimate origination of choices.

Moral realism faces challenges from evolutionary explanations of moral beliefs, cultural variation in moral practices, and philosophical arguments for anti-realist interpretations of moral language. Many contemporary moral philosophers adopt constructivist, expressivist, or error-theoretic approaches that would undermine the objective moral truth that Sterling's system requires.

Methodological Considerations

The foundationalist methodology that both Plato and Sterling employ faces challenges from contemporary epistemology, which tends toward coherentist or reliabilist approaches that reject the quest for indubitable first principles. The idea that moral philosophy can achieve mathematical certainty appears overly optimistic given the persistent disagreement among equally rational and informed moral philosophers.

The correspondence theory of truth faces challenges from pragmatist, coherentist, and deflationary approaches that question whether truth consists in correspondence to mind-independent reality. These alternative approaches would undermine the objective truth conditions that Sterling's system presupposes.

VII. Assessment and Future Directions

Sterling's reformed Stoicism represents a significant achievement in contemporary moral philosophy through its demonstration that systematic approaches can achieve both theoretical rigor and practical applicability. The alignment with Plato's six-commitment framework provides both validation and context for understanding the strengths and limitations of Sterling's approach.

Philosophical Assessment

The success of Sterling's system in achieving logical consistency and practical guidance suggests that reports of the death of systematic moral philosophy have been greatly exaggerated. His framework demonstrates that comprehensive approaches to moral philosophy remain viable when properly grounded in coherent metaphysical and epistemological foundations.

However, the framework's dependence on controversial metaphysical commitments limits its appeal in contemporary philosophical contexts that tend toward naturalistic and empirically-informed approaches. The tension between systematic comprehensiveness and metaphysical modesty represents a fundamental challenge for any attempt to revive classical approaches to moral philosophy.

Sterling's strategic decoupling of ethics from physics represents a promising direction for addressing this tension. By showing how ethical insights can maintain systematic rigor while being compatible with various metaphysical frameworks, Sterling points toward ways of preserving the benefits of systematic moral philosophy without requiring acceptance of particular cosmological or metaphysical theories.

Implications for Moral Philosophy

Sterling's work suggests several important directions for contemporary moral philosophy. First, the integration of metaphysical, epistemological, and ethical considerations may be necessary for achieving coherent practical guidance, even if the specific commitments differ from those Sterling adopts.

Second, the foundationalist methodology may retain value even if absolute certainty proves unachievable. Sterling's systematic approach enables rigorous testing of moral claims and coherent integration of various ethical considerations, providing benefits even if the foundations prove revisable rather than indubitable.

Third, the objective/subjective distinction in moral philosophy may require more careful analysis. Sterling's moral realism provides stability and universality for ethical guidance, suggesting that some form of objectivity may be necessary for practical moral philosophy, even if traditional metaphysical realism proves untenable.

Future Research Directions

Sterling's framework opens several promising avenues for future research. First, investigation of how ethical systems with systematic aspirations can be grounded in less controversial metaphysical foundations while maintaining coherence and practical guidance.

Second, exploration of how foundationalist methodology can be adapted to accommodate fallibilism and revisability while preserving the benefits of systematic organization and rigorous testing.

Third, examination of how moral objectivity can be understood in ways that preserve the practical benefits of moral realism while being compatible with naturalistic understandings of human psychology and social development.

Fourth, development of formal logical systems for representing and testing moral philosophies, building on the success of translating Sterling's framework into propositional logic.

VIII. Conclusion

Grant C. Sterling's reformed Stoicism achieves remarkable philosophical coherence through its adoption of the same six meta-philosophical commitments that Plato systematically developed in the Republic. The alignment between Sterling's framework and Plato's systematic approach is not coincidental but reflects the logical requirements for any comprehensive moral philosophy that aspires to both theoretical rigor and practical applicability.

Plato's Republic demonstrates how substance dualism, libertarian free will, ethical intuitionism, foundationalism, correspondence theory of truth, and moral realism function as an integrated system where each commitment logically requires and supports the others. Sterling's successful adaptation of this framework to contemporary moral philosophy shows that systematic approaches remain viable despite the fragmentation that characterizes much contemporary philosophical work.

The logical consistency that enables formal representation of Sterling's framework provides empirical evidence for the coherence of the six-commitment approach. The successful translation of Sterling's natural language philosophy into propositional logic validates both his foundationalist methodology and the systematic integration of his philosophical commitments.

However, the framework also reveals the challenges facing any attempt to revive classical systematic moral philosophy in contemporary contexts. The controversial nature of several key commitments - particularly substance dualism, libertarian free will, and traditional moral realism - limits the framework's appeal among philosophers committed to naturalistic approaches.

Sterling's strategic innovation - decoupling Stoic ethics from classical Stoic physics while maintaining systematic rigor - points toward promising directions for addressing these challenges. By showing how ethical insights can achieve universal applicability when properly grounded in rational principles rather than contingent metaphysical claims, Sterling demonstrates that systematic moral philosophy can adapt to contemporary concerns while preserving its essential benefits.

The enduring influence of Plato's Republic across 2,400 years of philosophical development suggests that the systematic integration of metaphysical, epistemological, and ethical commitments addresses persistent human needs for coherent understanding and practical guidance. Sterling's work indicates that these needs remain relevant for contemporary moral philosophy, even if the specific commitments require adaptation to contemporary knowledge and concerns.

The future of systematic moral philosophy may depend on finding ways to preserve the benefits of comprehensive integration - coherent practical guidance, rigorous testing of moral claims, and stable foundations for moral education - while adapting to contemporary insights about human nature, knowledge, and reality. Sterling's reformed Stoicism provides a valuable model for this adaptation, showing how classical systematic approaches can be updated for contemporary application while maintaining their essential systematic character.

References

Primary Sources

Diogenes Laertius. *Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Book VII (The Stoics)*. Translated by R.D. Hicks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1925.

Plato. *Republic*. Translated by G.M.A. Grube, revised by C.D.C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1992.

Sterling, Grant C. "Core Stoicism." *International Stoic Forum*, various dates.

Sterling, Grant C. Ethical Intuitionism and Its Critics. New York: Peter Lang, 1994.

Sterling, Grant C. "I receive impressions." *International Stoic Forum*, various dates.

Sterling, Grant C. "Pared to their most basic level, the Stoics say." *International Stoic Forum*, various dates.

Secondary Literature on Plato's Republic

Annas, Julia. *An Introduction to Plato's Republic*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.

Ferrari, G.R.F., ed. *The Cambridge Companion to Plato's Republic*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Fine, Gail. "Knowledge and Belief in Republic V-VII." In *Plato on Knowledge and Forms*, 85-115. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Kraut, Richard. "The Defense of Justice in Plato's Republic." In *The Cambridge Companion to Plato*, edited by Richard Kraut, 311-337. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Reeve, C.D.C. *Philosopher-Kings: The Argument of Plato's Republic*. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.

Santas, Gerasimos. *Understanding Plato's Republic*. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.

White, Nicholas P. *A Companion to Plato's Republic*. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1979.

Substance Dualism

Chalmers, David. *The Conscious Mind*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Foster, John. *The Immaterial Self: A Defence of the Cartesian Dualist Conception of Mind*. London: Routledge, 1991.

Hart, W.D. *The Engines of the Soul*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Jackson, Frank. "Epiphenomenal Qualia." *Philosophical Quarterly* 32, no. 127 (1982): 127-136.

Kim, Jaegwon. *Physicalism, or Something Near Enough*. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.

Lowe, E.J. *Personal Agency: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Robinson, William. "Dualism." *Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy*, 2020.

Swinburne, Richard. *The Evolution of the Soul*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.

Libertarian Free Will

Clarke, Randolph. *Libertarian Accounts of Free Will*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Fischer, John Martin. *The Metaphysics of Free Will*. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.

Kane, Robert. *The Significance of Free Will*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Kane, Robert, ed. *The Oxford Handbook of Free Will*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Mele, Alfred. *Free Will and Luck*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

O'Connor, Timothy. *Persons and Causes: The Metaphysics of Free Will*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Pereboom, Derk. *Living Without Free Will*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Van Inwagen, Peter. *An Essay on Free Will*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.

Ethical Intuitionism

Audi, Robert. *The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value*. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.

Crisp, Roger. "Intuitionism and Disagreement." *Utilitas* 14, no. 3 (2002): 349-361.

Huemer, Michael. *Ethical Intuitionism*. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

Parfit, Derek. *On What Matters*, Volume Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Pritchard, H.A. *Moral Obligation and Duty and Interest*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968.

Ross, W.D. *The Right and the Good*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1930.

Sterling, Grant C. Ethical Intuitionism and Its Critics. New York: Peter Lang, 1994. 

Stratton-Lake, Philip, ed. *Ethical Intuitionism: Re-evaluations*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Foundationalism

BonJour, Laurence. *The Structure of Empirical Knowledge*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.

Chisholm, Roderick. *Theory of Knowledge*, 3rd edition. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1989.

DePaul, Michael, ed. *Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism*. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.

Fumerton, Richard. *Metaepistemology and Skepticism*. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1995.

Goldman, Alvin. *Epistemology and Cognition*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.

Plantinga, Alvin. *Warrant and Proper Function*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Pollock, John. *Contemporary Theories of Knowledge*. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield, 1986.

Correspondence Theory of Truth

Alston, William. *A Realist Conception of Truth*. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.

Devitt, Michael. *Realism and Truth*, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.

Horwich, Paul. *Truth*. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.

Kirkham, Richard. *Theories of Truth*. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.

Lynch, Michael P. *Truth in Context*. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.

Putnam, Hilary. *Reason, Truth and History*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

Vision, Gerald. *Veritas: The Correspondence Theory and Its Critics*. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.

Moral Realism

Boyd, Richard. "How to Be a Moral Realist." In *Essays on Moral Realism*, edited by Geoffrey Sayre-McCord, 181-228. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.

Brink, David. *Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Dancy, Jonathan. *Moral Reasons*. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.

Enoch, David. *Taking Morality Seriously*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

FitzPatrick, William. "Robust Ethical Realism, Non-Naturalism, and Normativity." *Oxford Studies in Metaethics* 3 (2008): 159-205.

Parfit, Derek. *On What Matters*, Volume Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Railton, Peter. *Facts, Values, and Norms*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Shafer-Landau, Russ. *Moral Realism: A Defence*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Ancient and Contemporary Stoicism

Bobzien, Susanne. *Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Brennan, Tad. *The Stoic Life*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Hadot, Pierre. *Philosophy as a Way of Life*. Translated by Michael Chase. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.

Hadot, Pierre. *The Inner Citadel: The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius*. Translated by Michael Chase. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.

Inwood, Brad. *Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.

Irvine, William. *A Guide to the Good Life*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Long, A.A. *Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Long, A.A. and D.N. Sedley. *The Hellenistic Philosophers*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Nussbaum, Martha. *The Therapy of Desire*. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.

Sellars, John. *Stoicism*. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.

Systematic Moral Philosophy

Darwall, Stephen. *The Second-Person Standpoint*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.

Finnis, John. *Natural Law and Natural Rights*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.

Herman, Barbara. *The Practice of Moral Judgment*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.

MacIntyre, Alasdair. *After Virtue*, 3rd edition. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.

Rawls, John. *A Theory of Justice*, revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.

Scanlon, T.M. *What We Owe to Each Other*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.

Sidgwick, Henry. *The Methods of Ethics*, 7th edition. London: Macmillan, 1907.

Philosophy of Logic and Formal Systems

Beall, JC and Greg Restall. *Logical Pluralism*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Haack, Susan. *Philosophy of Logics*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

Priest, Graham. *An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic*, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Restall, Greg. *Logic: An Introduction*. London: Routledge, 2006.